Skip to content

Conversation

@luohewuyang
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

improve code comments clarity

Signed-off-by: luohewuyang <luohewuyang@outlook.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @luohewuyang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on refining the clarity and precision of existing code comments across two files. It addresses minor grammatical and wording inconsistencies to ensure that the inline documentation accurately conveys the intended meaning, thereby enhancing code readability and maintainability for future developers.

Highlights

  • Comment Clarity in submitter.go: Corrected a minor grammatical error in a comment within block/internal/submitting/submitter.go to improve its clarity regarding execution client errors.
  • Comment Wording in signed_header.go: Improved the wording and grammar in a comment in types/signed_header.go, changing 'basic validator' to 'basic validation' and 'granted data' to 'given data' for better readability.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to improve code comments. The change in types/signed_header.go is a good step towards better clarity. I've provided a suggestion to further refine the comment for conciseness and consistency. I also noticed significant code duplication between ValidateBasic and ValidateBasicWithData and recommend refactoring to improve maintainability. The change in block/internal/submitting/submitter.go appears to be a formatting-only change with no functional impact, so I have no feedback there.

}

// ValidateBasicWithData performs basic validator of a signed header, granted data for syncing node.
// ValidateBasicWithData performs basic validation of a signed header, given data for syncing node.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change improves the grammar, the comment could be more concise and align better with the comment for ValidateBasic. ValidateBasic is documented as being for an aggregator node. This function appears to be for a sync node. A more direct comment would be clearer.

Suggested change
// ValidateBasicWithData performs basic validation of a signed header, given data for syncing node.
// ValidateBasicWithData performs basic validation of a signed header for a sync node.


// ValidateBasicWithData performs basic validator of a signed header, granted data for syncing node.
// ValidateBasicWithData performs basic validation of a signed header, given data for syncing node.
func (sh *SignedHeader) ValidateBasicWithData(data *Data) error {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This function ValidateBasicWithData shares a significant amount of code with ValidateBasic (lines 110-186). This duplication makes the code harder to maintain, as bug fixes or logic changes need to be applied in both places.

To improve maintainability, consider refactoring the common validation logic into a private helper function. The differences, like the signature provider (aggregatorSignatureProvider vs. syncNodeSignatureBytesProvider), could be handled by passing a function as an argument to the new helper.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle merged commit 86b01ad into evstack:main Dec 22, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants