Modernised the instance type and block device size #20
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Sep 12, 2024
Open
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Going by the recommended specs here: https://satisfactory.fandom.com/wiki/Dedicated_servers
I have increased the instance type from m5a.large to m6a.xlarge.
This amounts to better CPU speeds and 2 more cores. It is also an increase of 8GiB RAM to 16GiB.
In the past few updates to the Satisfactory Dedicated Server there have been changes to take advantage of concurrency, before it was heavily single CPU bound. The minimum recommended RAM is now 12GiB, with 16GiB recommended for 4 players or large saves.
I have increased the block device to 30GB as minimum for the server is now 25GB.
If the cost increase is too much m6a.large could work and would be $0.004 per hour (at time of writing) more expensive, with good gains in CPU speed. Cost of m6a.xlarge is double ($0.1728) of a m5a.large.