feat(go): add an interrupt error judgment function

[eric642]

Add a function for judging tool interruption errors, which is convenient for scenarios where tools are called manually to determine interruption errors.

[eric642]

@hugoaguirre @apascal07 please review it

[eric642]

@apascal07 @hugoaguirre please review it

[apascal07]

Can I ask how you're expecting to use this? toolInterruptError is not meant to be user facing. Tools are also not meant to be called directly, although they can. Generally that type of usage is meant for flows.

[eric642]

@apascal07 I hope to be able to decide on the invocation of the tools by myself. When I use the option ai.WithReturnToolRequests(true), I need to invoke the tools myself.

resp, err := prompt.Execute(ctx,
		ai.WithInput(map[string]any{
			"date":     time.Now().Format(time.DateTime),
			"question": query,
		}),
		ai.WithTools(convert(reportTool.ReadFileTool(ctx), pptTool.GeneratePPTOutlineTool(g), pptTool.ModifyPPTPageTool(g), pptTool.InitializePPTTool())...),
		ai.WithReturnToolRequests(true),
		ai.WithModel(model),
		//ai.WithMaxTurns(math.MaxInt),
		ai.WithMiddleware(logReq()),
		ai.WithStreaming(stream),
		ai.WithConfig(openaigo.ChatCompletionNewParams{
			ReasoningEffort: shared.ReasoningEffortLow,
		}),
	)

When the user invokes the tool themselves, there needs to be a method to detect interruptions.

for _, req := range resp.ToolRequests() {
			tool := genkit.LookupTool(g, req.Name)
			if tool == nil {
				tool = genkit.LookupTool(g2, req.Name)
				if tool == nil {
					return "", fmt.Errorf("tool %s not found", req.Name)
				}
			}
			log.Info().Str("tool", req.Name).Any("input", req.Input).Msg("tool call")

			output, err := tool.RunRaw(ctx, req.Input)
			if err != nil {
				if meta, is := ai.IsToolInterruptError(err); is {
					return meta["value"].(string), nil
				}
				return "", fmt.Errorf("tool run failed:%v", err)
			}
			parts = append(parts, ai.NewToolResponsePart(&ai.ToolResponse{
				Name:   req.Name,
				Ref:    req.Ref,
				Output: output,
			}))
		}

[eric642]

@apascal07 please review it

[eric642]

@apascal07 Here, thx