-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 529
fix get max_q_len in page prefill plan #1930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix get max_q_len in page prefill plan #1930
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ZhuJiaqi9905, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical bug in the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes the calculation of max_q_len
by using the differences in qo_indptr
rather than its maximum value. This is a good correction. I've added one comment regarding an edge case for empty batches that could lead to a runtime error.
else: | ||
qo_indptr_host = qo_indptr.to("cpu") | ||
self._max_q_len = max(qo_indptr_host).item() | ||
self._max_q_len = max(qo_indptr_host[1:] - qo_indptr_host[:-1]).item() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line correctly calculates the maximum query length. However, it can raise a RuntimeError
if qo_indptr_host
contains only one element (i.e., when batch_size
is 0), because max()
would be called on an empty tensor. This can be handled by checking if batch_size > 0
.
self._max_q_len = (qo_indptr_host[1:] - qo_indptr_host[:-1]).max().item() if batch_size > 0 else 0
📌 Description
the plan method in BatchPrefillWithPagedKVCacheWrapper will compute max query len by using qo_indptr_host. However, previous code only get the maximum value of qo_indptr, which is incorrect.