-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
use target_compile_definitions for REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED instea… #507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use target_compile_definitions for REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED instea… #507
Conversation
…d of CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS
Summary of ChangesHello @BestITUserEUW, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the CMake build system to improve how the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request correctly replaces the direct modification of CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS
with target_compile_definitions
, which is a good practice in modern CMake. My review includes a suggestion to further refactor the CMake logic to improve maintainability and robustness by consolidating conditional checks and using target-specific properties for C++ standard requirements.
if(REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED) | ||
target_compile_definitions(reflectcpp PUBLIC REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED) | ||
endif() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change correctly uses target_compile_definitions
, which is an improvement. However, it introduces a second if(REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED)
block, duplicating the check from line 28. This can make the build logic harder to follow and maintain.
To consolidate this logic and make the CMake script more robust and modern, I'd suggest using target_compile_features
to specify C++ standard requirements directly on the reflectcpp
target. This would also provide better error messages if an incompatible C++ standard is used.
You could replace this new block and the one at lines 28-38 with a single block after add_library(reflectcpp ...)
:
# After add_library(reflectcpp ...)
if(REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED)
target_compile_features(reflectcpp PUBLIC cxx_std_23)
target_compile_definitions(reflectcpp PUBLIC REFLECTCPP_USE_STD_EXPECTED)
else()
target_compile_features(reflectcpp PUBLIC cxx_std_20)
endif()
This would remove the need to manipulate the global CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD
variable and centralize the feature configuration for the reflectcpp
target.
@BestITUserEUW thanks! |
…d of CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS. Addresses #506