Update Rust crate oxc to 0.105.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
oxc (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.95.0 -> 0.105.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[hash-worker]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package oxc@0.95.0 --precise 0.105.0
info: syncing channel updates for 'nightly-2025-12-15-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
info: latest update on 2025-12-15, rust version 1.94.0-nightly (0208ee09b 2025-12-14)
info: downloading component 'cargo'
info: downloading component 'clippy'
info: downloading component 'llvm-tools'
info: downloading component 'miri'
info: downloading component 'rust-analyzer'
info: downloading component 'rust-src'
info: downloading component 'rust-std'
info: downloading component 'rustc'
info: downloading component 'rustc-codegen-cranelift'
info: downloading component 'rustfmt'
info: installing component 'cargo'
info: installing component 'clippy'
info: installing component 'llvm-tools'
info: installing component 'miri'
info: installing component 'rust-analyzer'
info: installing component 'rust-src'
info: installing component 'rust-std'
info: installing component 'rustc'
info: installing component 'rustc-codegen-cranelift'
info: installing component 'rustfmt'
    Updating git repository `https://github.com/hashdeps/oxc`
From https://github.com/hashdeps/oxc
 * [new branch]          main       -> origin/main
 * [new ref]             HEAD       -> origin/HEAD
error: Unable to update https://github.com/hashdeps/oxc?rev=73c781b#0.105.0

Caused by:
  revspec '0.105.0' not found; class=Reference (4); code=NotFound (-3)

[cursor]

PR Summary

Update oxc workspace dependency in Cargo.toml from 0.95.0 to 0.105.0.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8c3c4b1. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.90%. Comparing base (06cc531) to head (8c3c4b1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8107   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.90%   58.90%           
=======================================
  Files        1193     1193           
  Lines      112723   112723           
  Branches     5013     5013           
=======================================
  Hits        66394    66394           
  Misses      45571    45571           
  Partials      758      758           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.18% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cursor]

Version update ineffective due to patch override

The version change from 0.95.0 to 0.105.0 in workspace dependencies will have no effect because a [patch.crates-io] section at line 389 overrides the oxc crate with a git fork at revision 73c781b (which is version 0.95.0). Cargo's patch mechanism takes precedence over version specifications, so the actual dependency version will remain unchanged. The patch section needs to be updated or removed for the version update to take effect.

 

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.734 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.61 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.273 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.455 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.223 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.26 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.97 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.603 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$417 \mathrm{ms} \pm 786 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$89.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$259 \mathrm{ms} \pm 672 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.787 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.683 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.593 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 496 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.928 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-62.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$556 \mathrm{ms} \pm 904 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph