-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Java 25 for CI builds #11155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sebersole
wants to merge
9
commits into
hibernate:main
Choose a base branch
from
sebersole:java25
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+33
−24
Open
Java 25 for CI builds #11155
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f0d4f3a
Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 0464bea
Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 6e08c5a
Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 600e956
Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole ad39770
Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 01ba91f
HHH-19894 : Use Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 8ffcfe9
HHH-19894 : Use Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 124e00e
HHH-19894 : Use Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole 823ec32
HHH-19894 : Use Java 25 for CI builds
sebersole File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder what's the history behind this and how bad it is to lose it... checking
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the reason: #hibernate-orm-dev > JDK builds @ 💬
TLDR: people will unknowningly using JDK 18+ APIs if we don't have a job that compiles the main code with JDK 17.
So I'd recommend something like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the s390x bit aside, this is for the most part working.
As for this desire to run one job with mainJdkVersion=17, there are 2 "problems"...
ci/build.shalways accounts for H2 using the problematic tasks. Your "something that skips javadoc" would need to get accounted for there. That's easy, but for completeness..-Porm.jdk.min=17for this one job. Coupled with the solution for (1), we aren't building the Javadoc so no harm, no foul.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact, for all of these H2 jobs from Jenkins we should always just skip javadoc generation. Stated more correctly, for these jobs from Jenkins we should treat them like the non-H2 jobs from GH workflow in terms of executing just
ciCheckinstead ofciCheck preVerifyReleaseThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll try to hack something but this Jenkinsfile syntax is bizarre to me :)