Skip to content

Conversation

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member

Alternative to #771. Better discussion there, but this reflects that we don't yet understand it, but also lets us move forward.

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member Author

Uh... does .flaky not do what I remember?

}

test(testSuitePrefix + " should split large buffers") {
test((testSuitePrefix + " should split large buffers").flaky) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It makes me whaaaat

test(testSuitePrefix + " should split large buffers".flaky) {} // compiles but doesn't work properly

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

though nothing new, silly type-weakness of string concatenation

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, good find. I always thought it was odd that operator went on the String in the first place.

@danicheg
Copy link
Member

danicheg commented Dec 1, 2022

@rossabaker hope you don't mind that I dropped my few lines here

@danicheg danicheg merged commit 2f1b219 into series/0.23 Dec 3, 2022
@danicheg danicheg deleted the flaky-ssl-suite branch December 3, 2022 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants