-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat(rust/rbac-registration): RBAC refactoring feature branch #630
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…in` (#586) * initial * feat: provider * feat: update chain * feat: start_new_chain * feat: merge validation result struct into cip509 * feat: exports * feat: return new chain * chore: return success object * fix: older version * feat: cat id in payload * fix: new version * chore: lintfix * chore: remove persistent arguments * tmp * chore: complete moving to central module * feat: ref fn * chore: merge methods * chore: minor * feat: export modified chains * chore: minor comment * chore: rbac update logic * chore: isolation * chore: validation and lintfix * docs: remove error doc * chore: minor refactor * fix: comments * chore: validation function return * Update rust/rbac-registration/src/providers.rs Co-authored-by: Alex Pozhylenkov <leshiy12345678@gmail.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Alex Pozhylenkov <leshiy12345678@gmail.com>
📚 Docs PreviewThe docs for this PR can be previewed at the following URL: |
|
✅ Test Report | |
rust/rbac-registration/src/cardano/cip509/utils/cip134_uri_set.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Rafał Chabowski <rafal.chabowski@iohk.io>
rafal-ch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
rust/rbac-registration/src/cardano/cip509/utils/cip134_uri_set.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bkioshn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks okay to me, just a small improvement to a doc
rafal-ch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Description
Related Pull Requests
RegistrationChain#586StakeAddresshandling. #631Cip0134UriSet#655Cip0134UriSetdata #658Please confirm the following checks