Skip to content

Conversation

@elbeno
Copy link
Contributor

@elbeno elbeno commented Oct 15, 2025

Problem:

  • The SIMULATE_FREESTANDING macro applies to multiple repos. Sometimes we might want finer-grained control over which elements of which repos are freestanding-compatible, because toolchains differ in what they support.

Solution:

  • Introduce STDX_FREESTANDING for this repo control.
  • Defining SIMULATE_FREESTANDING will also control STDX_FREESTANDING.

Problem:
- The `SIMULATE_FREESTANDING` macro applies to multiple repos. Sometimes we
  might want finer-grained control over which elements of which repos are
  freestanding-compatible, because toolchains differ in what they support.

Solution:
- Introduce `STDX_FREESTANDING` for this repo control.
- Defining `SIMULATE_FREESTANDING` will also control `STDX_FREESTANDING`.
@elbeno elbeno force-pushed the finesse-freestanding branch from f0d1f9b to 1721031 Compare October 15, 2025 19:22
@elbeno elbeno merged commit 4d468ed into intel:main Oct 16, 2025
50 checks passed
@elbeno elbeno deleted the finesse-freestanding branch October 16, 2025 20:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants