Skip to content

Conversation

@tisnik
Copy link
Contributor

@tisnik tisnik commented Jan 5, 2026

Description

LCORE-1071: docstrings for config unit tests

Type of change

  • Refactor
  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • CVE fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update
  • Configuration Update
  • Bump-up service version
  • Bump-up dependent library
  • Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
  • CI configuration change
  • Konflux configuration change
  • Unit tests improvement
  • Integration tests improvement
  • End to end tests improvement

Tools used to create PR

  • Assisted-by: CodeRabbitAI
  • Generated by: N/A

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #LCORE-1071

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test documentation to clarify validation behavior and configuration expectations for internal testing purposes.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Walkthrough

Four test files receive docstring enhancements describing expected behavior and validation outcomes. No functional changes to test logic, assertions, or control flow are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Test documentation updates
tests/unit/models/config/test_byok_rag.py, tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_scheduler_config.py, tests/unit/models/config/test_tls_configuration.py, tests/unit/models/config/test_user_data_collection.py
Docstrings expanded across four configuration test files to document expected behaviors, error conditions, and validation outcomes (e.g., ByokRag field handling, QuotaSchedulerConfiguration period assignment, TLS path validation, transcript storage validation). All changes are documentation-only; test assertions and logic remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding/updating docstrings for configuration-related unit tests across multiple test files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_scheduler_config.py (1)

21-27: Docstring omits other verified parameters.

The docstring focuses only on period, but the test also validates database_reconnection_count=2 and database_reconnection_delay=3. Consider updating the docstring to reflect all parameters being tested for completeness.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76dcbb3 and 72b9aea.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_byok_rag.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_scheduler_config.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_tls_configuration.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_user_data_collection.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage

Files:

  • tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_scheduler_config.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_tls_configuration.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_user_data_collection.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_byok_rag.py
tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Use pytest-mock with AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests

Files:

  • tests/unit/models/config/test_quota_scheduler_config.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_tls_configuration.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_user_data_collection.py
  • tests/unit/models/config/test_byok_rag.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
  • GitHub Check: build-pr
  • GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
  • GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
  • GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
  • GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
  • GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
  • GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai
  • GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/unit/models/config/test_tls_configuration.py (1)

71-78: LGTM!

The docstring accurately describes the test's purpose and expected behavior.

Note: The Raises: section is typically used to document exceptions raised by the function itself rather than expected exceptions in test assertions. You might consider rephrasing to "Expects a ValueError to be raised when..." for clarity, but this is purely optional.

tests/unit/models/config/test_byok_rag.py (2)

36-43: LGTM!

The docstring accurately documents the test's purpose: verifying that ByokRag accepts and stores non-default configuration values, with db_path converted to a Path.


93-100: LGTM!

The docstring clearly documents the validation behavior for empty rag_type.

tests/unit/models/config/test_user_data_collection.py (2)

36-44: LGTM!

The docstring clearly documents the validation scenario: transcripts_enabled=True with transcripts_storage=None raises ValueError.


54-64: LGTM!

The docstring thoroughly documents both error scenarios tested in this function, including the specific error messages expected for non-writable feedback and transcript storage paths.

@tisnik tisnik merged commit 686a190 into lightspeed-core:main Jan 5, 2026
19 of 27 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2026
15 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant