Skip to content

Conversation

DaKaZ
Copy link

@DaKaZ DaKaZ commented Dec 14, 2017

This PR fixes issue #123 where query strings are handled differently based on combinations of different libraries.

parsed_uri = URI.parse(uri)

return parsed_uri.request_uri if parsed_uri.respond_to?(:request_uri)
uri_without_host = uri.gsub(URI_WITHOUT_HOST_REGEXP, '')
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is URI_WITHOUT_HOST_REGEXP ?

uri.empty? ? '/' : uri
# Different version of request parsers escape/unescape the param values
# This will force param values to escaped
def escape_params(uri)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This method is untest and very difficult to understand.

udpates params parsing function and adds tests

Corrects error in merge

udpates specs
@DaKaZ
Copy link
Author

DaKaZ commented Dec 18, 2017

@fwininger I am sorry about that - I had a local helper which I did not include. Please see the new PR code attached which includes several new specs for testing. Note: I had to add Rails as a gemspec dependency since ActiveResource requires it. I am happy to make any changes you see fit, I am just trying to solve a issue affecting multiple people.

end
end

if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 2.1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you need this ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rest-client will throw an exception for an invalid URI in ruby versions 2.1 and below, I needed this so that all the CI tests would pass. I believe, in later versions the URI is properly escaped rather than throwing the exception but I did not verify in the rest-client code.

@DaKaZ
Copy link
Author

DaKaZ commented Jan 4, 2018

@fwininger any additional thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants