refactor: Update container image tag to include version detail #677
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This pull request updates the infrastructure templates to improve support for deploying with either new or existing AI Foundry projects, and adds outputs to expose the System Assigned Managed Identity Principal Id. It also updates the way container image tags are specified and referenced. The most important changes are as follows:
AI Foundry Project Integration Improvements:
existingFoundryProjectResourceId
parameter, and referencing the existing project resource directly in the deployment. [1] [2] [3]aiprojectSystemAssignedMIPrincipalId
as an output and parameter in multiple locations, ensuring the System Assigned Managed Identity Principal Id is available for both new and existing AI Foundry projects. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]Container Image Tag Parameterization:
containerImageTag
toimageTag
and updated its default value to a new version string; updated all references accordingly in both the Bicep and generated JSON templates. [1] [2] [3]Role Assignment and Resource Reference Changes:
Template Maintenance:
These updates make the infrastructure templates more flexible, maintainable, and better aligned with current deployment needs.
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Golden Path Validation
Deployment Validation
What to Check
Verify that the following are valid
Other Information