Skip to content

Conversation

@harshitrjpt
Copy link

@harshitrjpt harshitrjpt commented Oct 15, 2024

Changes done:

  1. create exemplar's labels object before creating the exemplar object. (deduplicated some code there)
  2. calculate labels length or runes.
  3. compare label runes with the hardcoded max rune. If limit reached, then return null exemplar obj.
  4. Added tests with sample LongSum metric data consisting exemplar for scenarios
    a) exemplar labels below max rune
    b) exemplar labels above max rune
> Task :exporters:prometheus:test

Otel2PrometheusConverterTest > exemplarLabelsAboveLimit() STANDARD_ERROR
    [Test worker] WARN io.opentelemetry.exporter.prometheus.Otel2PrometheusConverter - exemplar labels have 193 unicode code points, exceeding the limit of 128

@harshitrjpt harshitrjpt requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2024 07:57
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.39%. Comparing base (537f5c4) to head (55a1bac).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../exporter/prometheus/Otel2PrometheusConverter.java 93.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #6791      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     90.11%   90.39%   +0.27%     
- Complexity     6545     6580      +35     
============================================
  Files           728      731       +3     
  Lines         19702    19723      +21     
  Branches       1935     1928       -7     
============================================
+ Hits          17755    17829      +74     
+ Misses         1347     1297      -50     
+ Partials        600      597       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@harshitrjpt
Copy link
Author

Any clue why in 'markdown-link-check' job following links are failing:

  [✖] https://maven-badges.herokuapp.com/maven-central/io.opentelemetry/opentelemetry-api → Status: 503
  [✖] https://maven-badges.herokuapp.com/maven-central/io.opentelemetry/opentelemetry-api/badge.svg → Status: 503

How can we fix this?

@laurit
Copy link
Contributor

laurit commented Oct 17, 2024

Any clue why in 'markdown-link-check' job following links are failing:

  [✖] https://maven-badges.herokuapp.com/maven-central/io.opentelemetry/opentelemetry-api → Status: 503
  [✖] https://maven-badges.herokuapp.com/maven-central/io.opentelemetry/opentelemetry-api/badge.svg → Status: 503

How can we fix this?

Seems to be fixed now.

Level.WARNING,
"exemplar labels have "
+ codePoints
+ " codePoints, exceeding the limit of "
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'd replace codePoints with unicode code points to make it easier to understand what this warning means

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@laurit addressed.

Task :exporters:prometheus:test

Otel2PrometheusConverterTest > exemplarLabelsAboveLimit() STANDARD_ERROR
    [Test worker] WARN io.opentelemetry.exporter.prometheus.Otel2PrometheusConverter - exemplar labels have 193 unicode code points, exceeding the limit of 128

private static final String OTEL_SCOPE_VERSION = "otel_scope_version";
private static final long NANOS_PER_MILLISECOND = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toNanos(1);
static final int MAX_CACHE_SIZE = 10;
static final int EXEMPLAR_MAX_CODE_POINTS = 128;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this based on the specification somewhere?

null, // scope attributes are only needed for point's attributes
exemplar.getFilteredAttributes()),
exemplar.getEpochNanos() / NANOS_PER_MILLISECOND);
labels = convertAttributes(null, null, exemplar.getFilteredAttributes());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test that covers this (codecov claims it's not tested, and it seems like it would be good to have it covered)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants