Skip to content

Conversation

@zhouhao3
Copy link

In the opencontainers/runtime-tools#486 appeared in this problem, I think this will be better to modify.

Signed-off-by: zhouhao zhouhao@cn.fujitsu.com

Signed-off-by: zhouhao <zhouhao@cn.fujitsu.com>
The following parameters can be specified to set up namespaces:

* **`type`** *(string, REQUIRED)* - namespace type. The following namespace types are supported:
* **`type`** *(string, REQUIRED)* - namespace type. The following namespace types SHOULD be supported:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the runtime-spec PR, you're claiming a config validation, but the "supported" language here sounds like it targets the runtime. How about:

Configuration SHOULD use, and runtimes SHOULD support, the following types:

Personally, I'd prefer MUSTing runtime support (more in #813), but even SHOULD would better than the current lack of RFC 2119 language.

@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Dec 17, 2019

house keeping: I think the current vague language is being leveraged to not require certain kernel versions and features. Making this into RFC language MUST would not be acceptable. SHOULD is ok enough here.

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Dec 18, 2019

LGTM

... however, this is conflicting now and needs a rebase 😞

Approved with PullApprove

@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Dec 18, 2019

i've just messed this PR up, by trying to "fix" the commit within github ....

@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Dec 18, 2019

see #1025

@vbatts vbatts closed this Dec 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants