Skip to content

Conversation

@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu commented Nov 3, 2025

This PR cleans up some native code for Windows i18n functions. These particular calls are designed to run on Windows Vista and later. Since Vista (and older) are not supported Windows platforms, the calls no longer need to be checked if they are supported and can be called directly.

Reference to docs: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winnls/nf-winnls-getlocaleinfoex.

Minimum supported client: Windows Vista
Minimum supported server: Windows Server 2008


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8370420: HostLocaleProviderAdapter_md.c from libjava can use GetLocaleInfoEx, GetCalendarInfoEx, EnumCalendarInfoExEx directly (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28119/head:pull/28119
$ git checkout pull/28119

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28119
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28119/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28119

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28119

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28119.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 3, 2025

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2025

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8370420: HostLocaleProviderAdapter_md.c from libjava can use GetLocaleInfoEx, GetCalendarInfoEx, EnumCalendarInfoExEx directly

Reviewed-by: naoto, mbaesken, bpb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8370420: HostLocaleProviderAdapter_md.c from libjava can use GetLocaleInfoEx, GetCalendarInfoEx, EnumCalendarInfoExEx directly 8370420: HostLocaleProviderAdapter_md.c from libjava can use GetLocaleInfoEx, GetCalendarInfoEx, EnumCalendarInfoExEx directly Nov 3, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Nov 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2025

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 3, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks all right to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 4, 2025
@naotoj
Copy link
Member

naotoj commented Nov 4, 2025

I think we can clean it further, as we don't need to call Win32 through their function pointers. Specifically,

typedef int (WINAPI *PGLIE)(const jchar *, LCTYPE, LPWSTR, int);
typedef int (WINAPI *PGCIE)(const jchar *, CALID, LPCWSTR, CALTYPE, LPWSTR, int, LPDWORD);
typedef int (WINAPI *PECIEE)(CALINFO_ENUMPROCEXEX, const jchar *, CALID, LPCWSTR, CALTYPE, LPARAM);
PGLIE pGetLocaleInfoEx;
PGCIE pGetCalendarInfoEx;
PECIEE pEnumCalendarInfoExEx;
BOOL initialized = FALSE;

and it's init code can all go away, IIUC

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member

MBaesken commented Nov 4, 2025

I think we can clean it further, as we don't need to call Win32 through their function pointers. Specifically,

typedef int (WINAPI *PGLIE)(const jchar *, LCTYPE, LPWSTR, int);
typedef int (WINAPI *PGCIE)(const jchar *, CALID, LPCWSTR, CALTYPE, LPWSTR, int, LPDWORD);
typedef int (WINAPI *PECIEE)(CALINFO_ENUMPROCEXEX, const jchar *, CALID, LPCWSTR, CALTYPE, LPARAM);
PGLIE pGetLocaleInfoEx;
PGCIE pGetCalendarInfoEx;
PECIEE pEnumCalendarInfoExEx;
BOOL initialized = FALSE;

and it's init code can all go away, IIUC

Yes the GetProcAddress stuff should be removed too, see

pGetLocaleInfoEx = (PGLIE)GetProcAddress(

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 4, 2025
@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you all for the reviews and suggestions.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Going to push as commit 0026967.
Since your change was applied there have been 17 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 6, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 6, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2025

@justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit 0026967.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants