Skip to content

Conversation

@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor

…P families

This commit fixes the vSphere CAPI machine generation to correctly set DHCP4 and DHCP6 flags based on the InstallConfig's machine network configuration. Previously, DHCP4 was always enabled and DHCP6 was only enabled when IPv6 was detected, which caused issues for IPv6-only clusters.

Changes:

  • Replace hasIPv6MachineNetwork() with detectMachineNetworkIPFamilies() that returns both hasIPv4 and hasIPv6 by checking MachineNetwork and deprecated MachineCIDR fields
  • Update GenerateMachines() to set DHCP4=hasIPv4 and DHCP6=hasIPv6 instead of hard-coding DHCP4=true
  • Add comprehensive tests covering IPv4-only, IPv6-only, and dual-stack scenarios

This ensures:

  • IPv4-only: DHCP4=true, DHCP6=false
  • IPv6-only: DHCP4=false, DHCP6=true
  • Dual-stack: DHCP4=true, DHCP6=true

This prevents WaitingForIPAllocation failures for control-plane VMs in all network configurations by ensuring the VSphereMachine network devices match the machineconfig expectations.

Generated-by: GPT-5.1

…P families

This commit fixes the vSphere CAPI machine generation to correctly set
DHCP4 and DHCP6 flags based on the InstallConfig's machine network
configuration. Previously, DHCP4 was always enabled and DHCP6 was only
enabled when IPv6 was detected, which caused issues for IPv6-only
clusters.

Changes:
- Replace hasIPv6MachineNetwork() with detectMachineNetworkIPFamilies()
  that returns both hasIPv4 and hasIPv6 by checking MachineNetwork and
  deprecated MachineCIDR fields
- Update GenerateMachines() to set DHCP4=hasIPv4 and DHCP6=hasIPv6
  instead of hard-coding DHCP4=true
- Add comprehensive tests covering IPv4-only, IPv6-only, and dual-stack
  scenarios

This ensures:
- IPv4-only: DHCP4=true, DHCP6=false
- IPv6-only: DHCP4=false, DHCP6=true
- Dual-stack: DHCP4=true, DHCP6=true

This prevents WaitingForIPAllocation failures for control-plane VMs in
all network configurations by ensuring the VSphereMachine network
devices match the machineconfig expectations.

Generated-by: GPT-5.1
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rbbratta: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65847, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

…P families

This commit fixes the vSphere CAPI machine generation to correctly set DHCP4 and DHCP6 flags based on the InstallConfig's machine network configuration. Previously, DHCP4 was always enabled and DHCP6 was only enabled when IPv6 was detected, which caused issues for IPv6-only clusters.

Changes:

  • Replace hasIPv6MachineNetwork() with detectMachineNetworkIPFamilies() that returns both hasIPv4 and hasIPv6 by checking MachineNetwork and deprecated MachineCIDR fields
  • Update GenerateMachines() to set DHCP4=hasIPv4 and DHCP6=hasIPv6 instead of hard-coding DHCP4=true
  • Add comprehensive tests covering IPv4-only, IPv6-only, and dual-stack scenarios

This ensures:

  • IPv4-only: DHCP4=true, DHCP6=false
  • IPv6-only: DHCP4=false, DHCP6=true
  • Dual-stack: DHCP4=true, DHCP6=true

This prevents WaitingForIPAllocation failures for control-plane VMs in all network configurations by ensuring the VSphereMachine network devices match the machineconfig expectations.

Generated-by: GPT-5.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rvanderp3 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

building for test on dualstack-primaryv6.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 24, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2025

@rbbratta: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/golint ca3b307 link true /test golint
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-vsphere-ovn ca3b307 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn ca3b307 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants