Implement the launch command for launching an instance #59
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Catch errors when connecting to OpenStack initially.
This checks for the key in OpenStack first, then generates a key
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements MicroStack's previous
launchcommand, which would launch an OpenStack instance with a single command.This implementation uses the OpenStack SDK instead of relying on the OpenStack CLI snap. The
launchcommand will deploy an instance using the disk image, flavors, and network, and other assets setup using themicrostack configurecommand. Theconfigurecommand must run first before thelaunchcommand will run.This PR also adds output for the
clouds.yamlfile to theconfigurecommand. Thelaunchcommand requires theclouds.yamlfile to be present in order to function.Please let me know how the implementation can be better! I'm happy to make changes as needed for this feature to get landed.