Skip to content

Conversation

intbf
Copy link
Contributor

@intbf intbf commented Oct 17, 2025

We found that when the condition in get_processing_order is removed we get back to expected accuracy numbers.

Details:

  • This check only hides some real issue with memory sharing, so further debugging is needed

Tickets:

CVS-172659

@github-actions github-actions bot added the category: GPU OpenVINO GPU plugin label Oct 17, 2025
@sys-openvino-ci sys-openvino-ci added the ExternalPR External contributor label Oct 17, 2025
@intbf
Copy link
Contributor Author

intbf commented Oct 17, 2025

build_jenkins

3 similar comments
@Kotomi-Du
Copy link
Contributor

build_jenkins

@yeonbok
Copy link
Contributor

yeonbok commented Oct 17, 2025

build_jenkins

@p-durandin
Copy link
Contributor

build_jenkins

@intbf intbf marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2025 17:06
@intbf intbf requested review from a team as code owners October 20, 2025 17:06
@p-durandin
Copy link
Contributor

build_jenkins

intbf added 2 commits October 21, 2025 01:42
…n is improved

Signed-off-by: bfilipek <bartlomiej.filipek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: bfilipek <bartlomiej.filipek@intel.com>
@intbf intbf force-pushed the remove_condition_nesnet_test branch from d80c78c to 1c78f59 Compare October 21, 2025 08:42
@p-durandin
Copy link
Contributor

build_jenkins

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

category: GPU OpenVINO GPU plugin ExternalPR External contributor

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants