Skip to content

Conversation

4hiziri
Copy link
Contributor

@4hiziri 4hiziri commented Nov 18, 2017

In IPv6 class, previous pattern doesn't match fe80::1/64, but this pattern is valid.
So I add new pattern for subnet and this matches fe80::1/64.

This is not error now but wrong, so I fixed.

Previous pattern doesn't match fe80::1/64, but this pattern is valid.
So I add new pattern for subnet and this matches fe80::1/64.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant