Skip to content

AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow #2601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

PeyGis
Copy link
Contributor

@PeyGis PeyGis commented Jul 29, 2025

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Added docs pages

Please also include the path for the added docs

  • Quickstart (/)
  • Blueprint (/platform-overview/port-components/blueprint)
  • ...

Updated docs pages

Please also include the path for the updated docs

  • Quickstart (/)
  • Blueprint (/platform-overview/port-components/blueprint)
  • ...

@PeyGis PeyGis requested a review from Matanga1-2 July 29, 2025 09:13
Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-2601.d2ngvl90zqbob8.amplifyapp.com

description: "Learn how to create an AI agent that automatically generates GitHub issues from Jira tickets and assigns them to Copilot",
tags: ["SDLC", "Jira", "GitHub", "AI"],
logos: ["Jira", "GitHub", "AI"],
link: "/guides/all/create-ai-agent-to-automate-jira-to-github-workflow",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's update the file name to somethign simpler like automate-jira-to-github-copilot


# Create AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

This guide demonstrates how to create an AI agent that streamlines your development workflow by automatically generating GitHub issues from Jira tickets, assigning them to GitHub Copilot and linking pull requests back to Jira. You will learn how to set up a complete automation that bridges Jira and GitHub, enabling seamless ticket-to-deployment workflow.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's try to phrase it for the first part on pain points, e.g., "coding agents are fast, but important engineering context get lost in the process. In this guide..

3. Add labels to GitHub issues after creation
4. Update Jira tickets with pull request links

### Automation to trigger AI agent
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here we should share in a top that this automation can hev multiple approches to select which issues to trigger

  • Based on a label (current)
  • #of users Based on a different proprty and ownership

From Yonatan:
an explanation that in Port, you can configure exactly when you want to trigger an agent to perform a task. For example, you might want the agent to run only when a Jira issue has specific labels.

<img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" border="1px" width="100%" />


## Common use cases
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PeyGis this is describing what the workflow does, not what the common use cases are
Common use cases might be "Automate PR creation for small bugs", or "Provide easy access to Copilot when not using Github Issues broadly"
Can you come up with the 3-4 use cases?


When installing the Port's GitHub app, the pull request and repository blueprints are created by default. However, the GitHub issue blueprint needs to be created manually.

1. Go to the [builder](https://app.getport.io/settings/data-model) page of your portal.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A general suggestion, would it make sense to have a shared component on "how to add a blueprint"? I see we keep having these same 4 lines

4. Copy and paste the following JSON configuration:

<details>
<summary><b>GitHub issue blueprint (Click to expand)</b></summary>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I already installed the Github integration, won't I get it out of the box?
If the answer is that I will, worth saying "optional - if you already have the Github Issue blueprint, skip this step"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The GitHub integration only creates the repo and pull request OOTB. You will have to manually create the issue bp

operator: '"="'
value: .fields.customfield_10039.value
// highlight-start
pull_request:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the workflow make sure that the Jira key is always appearing in the PR title?

"properties": {
"description": "Creates Github issues from Jira tickets",
"status": "active",
"allowed_blueprints": [
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are there more blueprints/integrations that make sense to put here, given the demo we show?
Also, let's add a note before/after that the more integrations/data you add to the agent, the more context it will give to Copilot agent
Add examples like deployment history, related incidents, etc


4. Click `Create` to save the automation.

### Automation to add labels to GitHub issues
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's add under each automation a very short explanation on WHY we need it
Here, for example, "When creating a Github issue via the API, you can't set its labels. This automation does it right after creating the Github issue"

},
"invocationMethod": {
"type": "WEBHOOK",
"url": "https://your-domain.atlassian.net/rest/api/3/issue/{{ .event.diff.before.identifier }}/comment",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a note to replace it with your atlassian domain

"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": "We've discovered a PR for this issue. Find the link below:"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe "Port opened a PR for this issue"

<img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-ai-test.png" border="1px" width="100%" />


## Best practices
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove this section, it's pretty generic, and we can add the important stuff througout the guide

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Claude finished @PeyGis's task —— View job


PR Review: AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

Reviewing this PR according to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines...

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and repository guidelines
  • Review the main guide document (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md)
  • Review component configuration changes (consts.js)
  • Check image assets and their usage
  • Analyze existing review feedback for context
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive guide for automating Jira-to-GitHub workflows using AI agents and GitHub Copilot. The implementation includes new documentation, component configuration updates, and supporting images.

Review Findings

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Content: The guide covers the complete workflow from setup to testing
  2. Clear Structure: Well-organized with prerequisites, step-by-step instructions, and testing scenarios
  3. Technical Accuracy: Code examples appear complete and functional
  4. Image Support: Includes appropriate visual aids (workflow diagram and test screenshot)
  5. Integration Context: Properly addresses previous reviewer feedback

⚠️ Issues to Address

Critical Issues

  1. Title Inconsistency (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:8, consts.js:1345)

    • Guide title: "Automate Jira to GitHub Copilot"
    • Should be: "Automate Jira to GitHub Copilot" (consistent with reviewer feedback)
  2. File Naming Mismatch

    • Current filename: automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md
    • Component reference: Uses same name
    • Consider reviewer suggestion for simpler naming
  3. Configuration Issues

    • Line 382: Contains placeholder <GITHUB-ORG> and <GITHUB-REPO> that need user replacement
    • Line 488: Uses secrets.PORT_CLIENT_SECRET instead of secrets.PORT_GITHUB_TOKEN (inconsistent with secret definition)
    • Line 533: Incorrect token reference in get_issue_id step
    • Line 894: Placeholder <YOUR_ATLASSIAN_DOMAIN> needs documentation

Documentation Standards Issues

  1. Missing Context Explanations (per reviewer feedback)

    • Lines 690-692: Automation trigger criteria needs better explanation of alternative approaches
    • Missing explanation of why certain steps are needed (e.g., why labels can't be set during GitHub issue creation)
  2. Image Standards (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:12, 981)

    • Images missing required width specification per CONTRIBUTING.md
    • Should be: <img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" width="100%" border="1px" />
  3. Tone Issues

    • Line 27: Uses "you will create" instead of preferred "we will create" per CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
    • Should use "we" language throughout for consistency

Technical Issues

  1. Secret Reference Errors

    • Inconsistent secret names between documentation and workflow
    • Missing permissions documentation for GitHub PAT
  2. Missing Prerequisites

    • No clear explanation of required GitHub Copilot setup
    • Insufficient detail on required permissions

📝 Reviewer Feedback Analysis

The existing review comments highlight several valid concerns:

  • Better explanation of common use cases (partially addressed)
  • Need for alternative trigger approaches documentation
  • Placeholder replacements
  • Permission requirements
  • Workflow context explanations

🎯 Recommendations

  1. Fix Configuration Issues: Correct all placeholder values and secret references
  2. Improve Documentation: Add missing context explanations per reviewer feedback
  3. Standardize Images: Add proper width and border specifications
  4. Tone Consistency: Use "we" language throughout
  5. Technical Accuracy: Fix secret references in workflows
  6. Prerequisites Enhancement: Add clearer setup requirements

📋 CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance

  • ✅ Uses proper heading capitalization
  • ✅ Includes code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • ✅ Uses descriptive link text
  • ✅ Proper admonition usage
  • ⚠️ Image formatting needs correction
  • ⚠️ Tone needs adjustment to "we" language
  • ✅ Proper file structure and organization

🔧 Action Items

Based on this review and existing feedback, the following should be addressed:

  1. Fix image formatting with proper width and border attributes
  2. Correct secret reference inconsistencies in workflows
  3. Replace all placeholder values with proper documentation
  4. Add missing context explanations for automation approaches
  5. Standardize tone to use "we" language
  6. Enhance prerequisites section with permission details

The guide provides valuable content but needs these technical and documentation standard fixes before merge.

@Matanga1-2
Copy link
Contributor

@PeyGis we discussed let's include in this PR two guides:

  1. Trigger Github Copilot from Port
  2. Trigger a coding agent from Jira (we will have section saying something like "setup the trigger of the coding agent. See the Github Copilot guide for more details")

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Claude finished @PeyGis's task —— View job


PR Review: AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

Reviewing this PR according to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines...

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and repository guidelines
  • Review the main guide document (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md)
  • Review component configuration changes (consts.js)
  • Check image assets and their usage
  • Analyze existing review feedback for context
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive guide for automating Jira-to-GitHub workflows using AI agents and GitHub Copilot. The implementation includes new documentation, component configuration updates, and supporting images.

Review Findings

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Content: The guide covers the complete workflow from setup to testing
  2. Clear Structure: Well-organized with prerequisites, step-by-step instructions, and testing scenarios
  3. Technical Accuracy: Code examples appear complete and functional
  4. Image Support: Includes appropriate visual aids (workflow diagram and test screenshot)
  5. Integration Context: Properly addresses previous reviewer feedback

⚠️ Issues to Address

Critical Issues

  1. Missing Self-Service Actions Section (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:164)

    • The guide references "Set up self-service actions" but provides no implementation
    • This section appears incomplete and jumps directly to "Create AI agent"
  2. Tone Inconsistency (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:10, 27)

    • Per CONTRIBUTING.md line 27-28, should use "we" language instead of "you will"
    • Current: "you will learn how to create"
    • Should be: "we will create" or "let's create"
  3. Recent Comment Requirements

    • @Matanga1-2's latest comment requests splitting this into two guides:
      1. Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port
      2. Trigger a coding agent from Jira
    • Current PR doesn't address this architectural change

Documentation Standards Issues

  1. Image Formatting (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:12, 399)

    • Images missing width specification per CONTRIBUTING.md line 85-87
    • Should be: <img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" width="100%" border="1px" />
    • Current format is non-compliant with style guide
  2. Section Organization

    • Line 164: "Set up self-service actions" section is empty but referenced
    • Missing content creates broken reading flow

Technical Issues

  1. Prerequisites Reference (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:30)

    • References "Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port guide" that may not exist yet
    • Creates potential broken link dependency
  2. Configuration Context

    • Missing explanation of secret setup mentioned in line 164
    • Action configuration examples are incomplete

📝 Previous Reviewer Feedback Status

Based on existing review comments, several issues remain unaddressed:

  • File naming suggestions from @Matanga1-2
  • Title consistency requirements
  • Multiple suggestions for content improvements
  • Recent architectural change request (splitting guides)

🎯 Recommendations

  1. Address Architectural Feedback: Implement @Matanga1-2's request to split into two guides
  2. Complete Missing Sections: Implement the "Set up self-service actions" section
  3. Fix Documentation Standards:
    • Correct image formatting with proper width and border attributes
    • Update tone to use "we" language consistently
  4. Prerequisites Clarity: Ensure all referenced guides exist or provide alternatives

📋 CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance

  • ✅ Uses proper heading capitalization
  • ✅ Includes code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • ✅ Uses descriptive link text
  • ✅ Proper admonition usage
  • ⚠️ Image formatting needs correction
  • ⚠️ Tone needs adjustment to "we" language
  • ⚠️ Missing content in referenced sections
  • ✅ Proper file structure and organization

🔧 Action Items

Based on this review and @Matanga1-2's latest feedback:

  1. High Priority: Address the request to split into two separate guides
  2. Complete the missing "Set up self-service actions" section
  3. Fix image formatting with proper width and border attributes
  4. Standardize tone to use "we" language throughout
  5. Verify all prerequisite links and dependencies
  6. Consider previous reviewer suggestions for technical improvements

💡 Additional Notes

The guide provides valuable technical content, but the recent architectural feedback suggests a fundamental restructuring may be needed. Consider whether to:

  • Implement the split-guide approach as requested
  • Address the missing sections in the current structure
  • Both approaches may require significant rework

The content quality is good, but compliance with documentation standards and architectural decisions should be prioritized before merge.


- You have access to [create and configure AI agents](https://docs.port.io/ai-agents/overview#getting-started-with-ai-agents) in Port.
- You have completed the setup in the [Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port guide](https://docs.port.io/guides/all/trigger-github-copilot-from-port), ensuring that Copilot will be automatically assigned to any GitHub issues created through this guide.

:::tip Alternative integrations
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add another note that this shows Githbu Copiot but you could similarly use any other coding agent like Claude code Devin etc

5. Click `Save` to update the integration configuration.


## Set up self-service actions
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

redundant? no need for this title anymore

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Claude finished @PeyGis's task —— View job


PR Review: AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

Reviewing this PR according to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines...

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and repository guidelines
  • Review the main guide document (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md)
  • Review component configuration changes (consts.js)
  • Check image assets and their usage
  • Analyze existing review feedback for context
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive guide for automating Jira-to-GitHub workflows using AI agents and GitHub Copilot. The implementation includes new documentation, component configuration updates, and supporting images.

Review Findings

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Content: The guide covers the complete workflow from setup to testing
  2. Clear Structure: Well-organized with prerequisites, step-by-step instructions, and testing scenarios
  3. Technical Accuracy: Code examples appear complete and functional
  4. Image Support: Includes appropriate visual aids (workflow diagram and test screenshot)
  5. Integration Context: Properly addresses previous reviewer feedback

⚠️ Issues to Address

Critical Issues

  1. Missing Self-Service Actions Section (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:164)

    • The guide references "Set up self-service actions" but provides no implementation
    • This section appears incomplete and jumps directly to "Create AI agent"
  2. Tone Inconsistency (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:10)

    • Per CONTRIBUTING.md line 27-28, should use "we" language instead of "you will"
    • Current: "you will learn how to create"
    • Should be: "we will create" or "let's create"
  3. Recent Comment Requirements

    • @Matanga1-2's latest comment requests splitting this into two guides:
      1. Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port
      2. Trigger a coding agent from Jira
    • Current PR doesn't address this architectural change

Documentation Standards Issues

  1. Image Formatting (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:12, 399)

    • Images missing width specification per CONTRIBUTING.md line 85-87
    • Current: <img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" border="1px" width="100%" />
    • Compliant format confirmed ✅
  2. Section Organization

    • Line 164: "Set up self-service actions" section is empty but referenced
    • Missing content creates broken reading flow

Technical Issues

  1. Prerequisites Reference (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:30)

    • References "Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port guide" that may not exist yet
    • Creates potential broken link dependency
  2. Configuration Context

    • Missing explanation of secret setup mentioned in line 164
    • Action configuration examples are incomplete
  3. Placeholder Documentation (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:296)

    • Line 296: Contains <YOUR_ATLASSIAN_DOMAIN> placeholder
    • Needs clear instruction for replacement

📝 Previous Reviewer Feedback Status

Based on existing review comments, several issues remain unaddressed:

  • @Matanga1-2's request to split into two guides (most recent feedback)
  • Title consistency requirements
  • Multiple suggestions for content improvements
  • Section 162 marked as "redundant" in latest review

🎯 Recommendations

  1. Address Architectural Feedback: Implement @Matanga1-2's request to split into two guides
  2. Complete Missing Sections: Implement the "Set up self-service actions" section or remove the reference
  3. Fix Documentation Standards:
    • Update tone to use "we" language consistently
    • Remove redundant section titles per reviewer feedback
  4. Prerequisites Clarity: Ensure all referenced guides exist or provide alternatives
  5. Add Context Note: Include note about alternative coding agents per line 32 feedback

📋 CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance

  • ✅ Uses proper heading capitalization
  • ✅ Includes code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • ✅ Uses descriptive link text
  • ✅ Proper admonition usage
  • ✅ Image formatting follows guidelines (width and border specified)
  • ⚠️ Tone needs adjustment to "we" language
  • ⚠️ Missing content in referenced sections
  • ✅ Proper file structure and organization

🔧 Action Items

Based on this review and @Matanga1-2's latest feedback:

  1. High Priority: Address the request to split into two separate guides
  2. Complete the missing "Set up self-service actions" section or remove reference
  3. Standardize tone to use "we" language throughout
  4. Add note about alternative coding agents (Claude Code, Devin, etc.) per feedback
  5. Remove redundant section title at line 162
  6. Verify all prerequisite links and dependencies
  7. Document placeholder replacement requirements clearly

💡 Additional Notes

The guide provides valuable technical content, but the recent architectural feedback suggests a fundamental restructuring may be needed. Consider whether to:

  • Implement the split-guide approach as requested
  • Address the missing sections in the current structure
  • Both approaches may require significant rework

The content quality is good, but compliance with recent reviewer feedback and architectural decisions should be prioritized before merge.


Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Claude finished @PeyGis's task —— View job


PR Review: AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

Reviewing this PR according to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines...

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and repository guidelines
  • Review the main guide document (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md)
  • Review component configuration changes (consts.js)
  • Check image assets and their usage
  • Analyze existing review feedback for context
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive guide for automating Jira-to-GitHub workflows using AI agents and GitHub Copilot. The implementation includes new documentation, component configuration updates, and supporting images.

Review Findings

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Content: The guide covers the complete workflow from setup to testing
  2. Clear Structure: Well-organized with prerequisites, step-by-step instructions, and testing scenarios
  3. Technical Accuracy: Code examples appear complete and functional
  4. Image Support: Includes appropriate visual aids (workflow diagram and test screenshot)
  5. Integration Context: Properly addresses previous reviewer feedback

⚠️ Issues to Address

Critical Issues

  1. Recent Comment Requirements

    • @Matanga1-2's latest comment requests splitting this into two guides:
      1. Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port
      2. Trigger a coding agent from Jira
    • Current PR doesn't address this architectural change request
  2. Tone Inconsistency (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:10)

    • Per CONTRIBUTING.md line 27-28, should use "we" language instead of "you will"
    • Current: "we will learn how to create"
    • Should be: "let's create" or "we will create" (this line is actually correct)
    • However, line 27: "You have access to..." should be "We have access to..."

Documentation Standards Issues

  1. Image Formatting (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:12, 453)

    • Images correctly include width and border specifications per CONTRIBUTING.md ✅
    • Format follows guidelines: <img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" border="1px" width="100%" />
  2. Missing Context Note (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:32)

    • Per reviewer feedback, needs note about alternative coding agents
    • Should add: "This guide demonstrates using GitHub Copilot, but you can also use other coding agents like Claude Code, Devin, etc."
    • UPDATE: This note is already present at lines 36-38 ✅

Technical Issues

  1. Placeholder Documentation (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:375)

    • Line 375: Contains <YOUR_ATLASSIAN_DOMAIN> placeholder
    • Has proper instruction at lines 349-351 ✅
  2. Prerequisites Reference (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:30)

    • References "Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port guide"
    • This creates dependency that may not exist yet

Minor Issues

  1. Redundant Section Title (per reviewer feedback)
    • Reviewer noted line 162 as "redundant" but this appears to be resolved in current version

📝 Previous Reviewer Feedback Status

Analyzing existing review comments:

  • ✅ Image formatting with proper width and border attributes
  • ✅ Alternative coding agents note added
  • ✅ Use cases section improved
  • ✅ Technical configurations appear correct
  • Major Issue: @Matanga1-2's latest architectural feedback (split into two guides) not addressed

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Address Architectural Feedback: Implement @Matanga1-2's request to split into two separate guides
  2. Minor Tone Fix: Adjust "You have access to..." to "We have access to..." in prerequisites

Medium Priority

  1. Verify all prerequisite links and dependencies exist
  2. Consider adding more context about when to use this workflow

📋 CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance

  • ✅ Uses proper heading capitalization
  • ✅ Includes code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • ✅ Uses descriptive link text
  • ✅ Proper admonition usage
  • ✅ Image formatting follows guidelines (width and border specified)
  • ✅ Proper file structure and organization
  • ✅ Uses "we" language (mostly - one minor exception)

🔧 Action Items

Based on this review and @Matanga1-2's latest feedback:

  1. Critical: Address the request to split into two separate guides as outlined in latest comment
  2. Fix minor tone inconsistency in prerequisites section
  3. Verify prerequisite guide dependencies
  4. Consider if current single-guide approach should be maintained vs. split approach

💡 Additional Notes

The guide provides excellent technical content and follows most documentation standards well. However, the recent architectural feedback from @Matanga1-2 requesting a split into two guides represents a significant change that should be addressed before merge. This may require substantial restructuring of the content.

The content quality is high, but the architectural decision needs resolution before proceeding with merge.


Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Claude finished @PeyGis's task —— View job


PR Review: AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

Reviewing this PR according to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines...

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and repository guidelines
  • Review the main guide document (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md)
  • Review component configuration changes (consts.js)
  • Check image assets and their usage
  • Analyze existing review feedback for context
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive guide for automating Jira-to-GitHub workflows using AI agents and GitHub Copilot. The implementation includes new documentation, component configuration updates, and supporting images.

Review Findings

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Content: The guide covers the complete workflow from setup to testing
  2. Clear Structure: Well-organized with prerequisites, step-by-step instructions, and testing scenarios
  3. Technical Accuracy: Code examples appear complete and functional
  4. Image Support: Includes appropriate visual aids (workflow diagram and test screenshot)
  5. Integration Context: Properly addresses previous reviewer feedback

⚠️ Issues to Address

Critical Issues

  1. Recent Comment Requirements

    • @Matanga1-2's latest comment requests splitting this into two guides:
      1. Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port
      2. Trigger a coding agent from Jira
    • Current PR doesn't address this architectural change request
  2. Tone Inconsistency (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:10)

    • Per CONTRIBUTING.md line 27-28, should use "we" language instead of "you will"
    • Current: "we will learn how to create"
    • Should be: "let's create" or "we will create" (this line is actually correct)
    • However, line 27: "You have access to..." should be "We have access to..."

Documentation Standards Issues

  1. Image Formatting (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:12, 453)

    • Images correctly include width and border specifications per CONTRIBUTING.md ✅
    • Format follows guidelines: <img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" border="1px" width="100%" />
  2. Missing Context Note (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:32)

    • Per reviewer feedback, needs note about alternative coding agents
    • Should add: "This guide demonstrates using GitHub Copilot, but you can also use other coding agents like Claude Code, Devin, etc."
    • UPDATE: This note is already present at lines 36-38 ✅

Technical Issues

  1. Placeholder Documentation (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:375)

    • Line 375: Contains <YOUR_ATLASSIAN_DOMAIN> placeholder
    • Has proper instruction at lines 349-351 ✅
  2. Prerequisites Reference (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:30)

    • References "Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port guide"
    • This creates dependency that may not exist yet

Minor Issues

  1. Redundant Section Title (per reviewer feedback)
    • Reviewer noted line 162 as "redundant" but this appears to be resolved in current version

📝 Previous Reviewer Feedback Status

Analyzing existing review comments:

  • ✅ Image formatting with proper width and border attributes
  • ✅ Alternative coding agents note added
  • ✅ Use cases section improved
  • ✅ Technical configurations appear correct
  • Major Issue: @Matanga1-2's latest architectural feedback (split into two guides) not addressed

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Address Architectural Feedback: Implement @Matanga1-2's request to split into two separate guides
  2. Minor Tone Fix: Adjust "You have access to..." to "We have access to..." in prerequisites

Medium Priority

  1. Verify all prerequisite links and dependencies exist
  2. Consider adding more context about when to use this workflow

📋 CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance

  • ✅ Uses proper heading capitalization
  • ✅ Includes code blocks with syntax highlighting
  • ✅ Uses descriptive link text
  • ✅ Proper admonition usage
  • ✅ Image formatting follows guidelines (width and border specified)
  • ✅ Proper file structure and organization
  • ✅ Uses "we" language (mostly - one minor exception)

🔧 Action Items

Based on this review and @Matanga1-2's latest feedback:

  1. Critical: Address the request to split into two separate guides as outlined in latest comment
  2. Fix minor tone inconsistency in prerequisites section
  3. Verify prerequisite guide dependencies
  4. Consider if current single-guide approach should be maintained vs. split approach

💡 Additional Notes

The guide provides excellent technical content and follows most documentation standards well. However, the recent architectural feedback from @Matanga1-2 requesting a split into two guides represents a significant change that should be addressed before merge. This may require substantial restructuring of the content.

The content quality is high, but the architectural decision needs resolution before proceeding with merge.


Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Claude finished @PeyGis's task —— View job



PR Review: AI agent to automate Jira to GitHub workflow

Reviewing this PR according to CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines...

Todo List:

  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and repository guidelines
  • Review the main guide document (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md)
  • Review component configuration changes (consts.js)
  • Check image assets and their usage
  • Analyze existing review feedback for context
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive guide for automating Jira-to-GitHub workflows using AI agents and GitHub Copilot. The implementation includes new documentation, component configuration updates, and supporting images.

Review Findings

Strengths

  1. Comprehensive Content: The guide covers the complete workflow from setup to testing
  2. Clear Structure: Well-organized with prerequisites, step-by-step instructions, and testing scenarios
  3. Technical Accuracy: Code examples appear complete and functional
  4. Image Support: Includes appropriate visual aids (workflow diagram and test screenshot)
  5. CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance: Generally follows documentation standards well

⚠️ Issues to Address

Critical Issues

  1. Outstanding Architectural Feedback

    • @Matanga1-2's comment from Aug 5th requests splitting this into two separate guides:
      1. "Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port"
      2. "Trigger a coding agent from Jira"
    • This represents a significant architectural change that should be addressed
  2. Tone Inconsistency (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:27)

    • Per CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines (lines 27-28), should use "we" language instead of "you"
    • Current: "You have access to..."
    • Should be: "We have access to..." or similar

Documentation Standards

  1. Image FormattingRESOLVED

    • Images correctly include width and border specifications per CONTRIBUTING.md (lines 85-87)
    • Format follows guidelines: <img src="/img/guides/jira-to-github-pr-workflow.jpg" border="1px" width="100%" />
  2. Alternative Coding Agents NoteRESOLVED

    • Per @Matanga1-2's feedback, note about alternative coding agents is present (lines 36-38)
    • Appropriately mentions Claude Code, Devin, etc.
  3. Prerequisites Reference (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:30)

    • References "Trigger GitHub Copilot from Port guide" which may create dependency issues
    • This link should be verified or the split-guide approach should be implemented

Technical Issues

  1. Placeholder Documentation (automate-jira-to-github-copilot.md:375)

    • Contains <YOUR_ATLASSIAN_DOMAIN> placeholder
    • Has proper instruction at lines 349-351 for replacement ✅
  2. Code ExamplesCOMPLIANT

    • All code blocks include showLineNumbers as required by CONTRIBUTING.md (line 94)
    • Proper syntax highlighting is used throughout

📝 Previous Review Feedback Status

Analyzing the multiple review rounds:

✅ Resolved Issues:

  • Image formatting with proper width/border attributes
  • Alternative coding agents note added
  • Code block formatting with line numbers
  • Technical configurations appear correct

❌ Outstanding Issues:

  • Critical: @Matanga1-2's latest architectural feedback (Aug 5, 2025) requesting split into two guides
  • Minor tone adjustments needed per CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
  • Prerequisites dependency verification

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Address Architectural Decision: The request to split into two guides should be clarified/implemented before merge
  2. Minor Language Fix: Update "You have access to..." to "We have access to..." (line 27)

Medium Priority

  1. Verify prerequisite guide dependencies or implement the split-guide architecture
  2. Consider adding more specific context about when to use this workflow vs alternatives

📋 CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance Assessment

✅ Compliant:

  • Proper heading capitalization (line 17)
  • Uses descriptive link text (line 69)
  • Code blocks with syntax highlighting and line numbers (lines 94-99)
  • Images with proper width/border formatting (lines 85-87)
  • Proper admonition usage with titles (lines 112-117)
  • Clear, concise sentences and active voice (lines 31-32)
  • Structured guide with numbered steps (line 41)

⚠️ Minor Issues:

  • One instance of "you" language instead of "we" language (line 27-28)
  • Dependency on potentially non-existent prerequisite guide

✅ Technical Writing Standards:

  • Accuracy: Technical information appears correct
  • Completeness: Comprehensive coverage of the workflow
  • Examples: Good use of real-world examples
  • Consistency: Consistent terminology and formatting

🔧 Action Items

Based on this review and existing feedback:

  1. Critical: Address @Matanga1-2's request to split into two guides OR get clarification on whether to proceed with current approach
  2. Fix minor tone inconsistency ("You have access" → "We have access")
  3. Verify prerequisite guide links or adjust based on architectural decision
  4. Consider final review of placeholder documentation

💡 Overall Assessment

The guide provides excellent technical content and generally follows CONTRIBUTING.md standards well. The main blocker is the outstanding architectural feedback requesting a split into two guides. This should be resolved before merge to ensure the content structure aligns with the intended information architecture.

Quality: High
CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance: Good (minor tone adjustment needed)
Blocker: Architectural decision needed


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants