Skip to content

Conversation

Mariamalmesfer
Copy link
Contributor

@Mariamalmesfer Mariamalmesfer commented Oct 6, 2025

Description

Upgrade RoaringBitmap to 1.3.0

Motivation and Context

Impact

Test Plan

Contributor checklist

  • Please make sure your submission complies with our contributing guide, in particular code style and commit standards.
  • PR description addresses the issue accurately and concisely. If the change is non-trivial, a GitHub Issue is referenced.
  • Documented new properties (with its default value), SQL syntax, functions, or other functionality.
  • If release notes are required, they follow the release notes guidelines.
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable.
  • CI passed.

Release Notes

Please follow release notes guidelines and fill in the release notes below.

== RELEASE NOTES ==

Security Changes
* Upgrade RoaringBitmap to 1.3.0.

@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci added the from:IBM PR from IBM label Oct 6, 2025
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Oct 6, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: Mariamalmesfer / name: Mariam AlMesfer (f956159)

@Mariamalmesfer Mariamalmesfer force-pushed the roaringbitmap-upgrade branch 2 times, most recently from deeeaf5 to 591dad8 Compare October 6, 2025 11:15
@steveburnett
Copy link
Contributor

Please add a release note to this PR. Thanks!

@Mariamalmesfer Mariamalmesfer changed the title Upgrade RoaringBitmap to latest version chore(connector): Upgrade RoaringBitmap to 1.3.0 Oct 6, 2025
@Mariamalmesfer Mariamalmesfer marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2025 21:59
@Mariamalmesfer Mariamalmesfer requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2025 21:59
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci requested review from a team, ScrapCodes and aaneja and removed request for a team October 6, 2025 21:59
Copy link
Member

@agrawalreetika agrawalreetika left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, it would be good to run some basic sanity test on pinot connector with the change to make sure its not breaking pinot connector query?

@Mariamalmesfer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mariamalmesfer commented Oct 8, 2025

LGTM, it would be good to run some basic sanity test on pinot connector with the change to make sure its not breaking pinot connector query?

@agrawalreetika Sure, I ran some queries, please check.
image
image
image
image

Copy link
Member

@hantangwangd hantangwangd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@pratyakshsharma pratyakshsharma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the fix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from:IBM PR from IBM
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants