- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 2.3k
 
[cherry-pick] Address issue#41311 (#41415) #41568
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[cherry-pick] Address issue#41311 (#41415) #41568
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request appears to be a cherry-pick that corrects several test plan descriptions and enhances assertions within the TC_TLSCLIENT.py test file. The changes generally improve the clarity and robustness of the tests. I've identified one minor issue in an updated test description that appears to contain a typo.
| 
           PR #41568: Size comparison from 4e79c29 to 3ce5070 Full report (37 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, efr32, esp32, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, realtek, stm32, telink)
  | 
    
          Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           v1.5-sve-branch   #41568   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            50.94%   50.94%           
================================================
  Files                 1378     1378           
  Lines               100728   100728           
  Branches             13065    13065           
================================================
  Hits                 51318    51318           
  Misses               49410    49410           ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  | 
    
Summary
cherry pick #41415
Related issues
N/A
Testing
Validate by CI
Readability checklist
The checklist below will help the reviewer finish PR review in time and keep the
code readable:
descriptive
“When in Rome…”
rule (coding style)
See: Pull Request Guidelines