-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
Benchmarks for perf #1756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmarks for perf #1756
Conversation
…w it to be captured by PGO builds and track performance
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #1756 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just needs the groups adjusting, otherwise lgtm, thanks!
a70ca0f
to
b8ce2be
Compare
b8ce2be
to
eac083b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
Change Summary
Just a quick follow up to the feature to give some benchmarks to test performance. I saw about a 3% improvement locally when building with these
Related issue number
Checklist
pydantic-core
(except for expected changes)