Skip to content

Conversation

@seddonym
Copy link
Collaborator

@seddonym seddonym commented Dec 8, 2025

As raised here #268

(Currently this is just a failing test.)

Hopefully upgrading the Ruff libraries will sort this out.

@seddonym seddonym changed the title Add failing test for t-string syntax Support Python 3.14 syntax Dec 8, 2025
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 8, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #269 will not alter performance

Comparing support-python-3.14-syntax (f87361c) with main (558e62c)

Summary

✅ 26 untouched
⏩ 23 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 23 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Prior to this, the t-string syntax (added in Python 3.14) would cause a
syntax error.
@seddonym seddonym marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 17:29
@seddonym seddonym merged commit 9030d92 into main Dec 8, 2025
18 checks passed
@seddonym seddonym deleted the support-python-3.14-syntax branch December 8, 2025 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants