Skip to content

Conversation

@mhucka
Copy link
Contributor

@mhucka mhucka commented Jul 19, 2025

This reorganizes the file slightly to

  • try to make it easier to find things (e.g., by not splitting up docs and code in completely separate sections)

  • put the rule for docs/** higher, because the way it was before, it would have overwritten the more specific settings

  • use rooted paths, to avoid accidentally matching subdirectories (e.g., because there's a docs in dev_tools/ too)

I also removed a couple of users who either have left Google or have not been involved for a long time.

This reorganizes the file slightly to

- try to make it easier to find things (e.g., by not splitting up docs
  and code in completely separate sections)

- put the rule for docs/** higher, because the way it was before, it
  would have overwritten the more specific settings

- use rooted paths, to avoid accidentally matching subdirectories (e.g.,
  because there's a docs in dev_tools/ too)

I also removed a couple of users who either have left Google or have not
been involved for a long time.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size: M 50< lines changed <250 label Jul 19, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically labeled as stale because 90 days have passed without comments or other activity. If no further activity occurs and the status/stale label is not removed by a maintainer within 60 days, this pull request will be closed. If you would like to restore its active status, please leave a comment here; doing so will cause the staleness handler to remove the label.

If you have questions or feedback about this process, we welcome your input. You can open a new issue to let us know (please also reference this issue there, for continuity), or reach out to the project maintainers at quantum-oss-maintainers@google.com.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the status/stale This has been closed due to inactivity for an extended period of time. label Oct 18, 2025
/docs/hardware/pasqal/**/*.* @HGSilveri @quantumlib/cirq-maintainers @vtomole

docs/hardware/aqt/**/*.* @ma5x @pschindler @alfrisch @aasfaw @rmlarose @quantumlib/cirq-maintainers @vtomole
/docs/hardware/azure-quantum/**/*.* @guenp @anpaz @quantumlib/cirq-maintainers @vtomole
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guenp is not at azure quantum anymore https://www.linkedin.com/in/guenpw/

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/docs/hardware/azure-quantum/**/*.* @guenp @anpaz @quantumlib/cirq-maintainers @vtomole
/docs/hardware/azure-quantum/**/*.* @xinyi-joffre @kikomiss @quantumlib/cirq-maintainers @vtomole

I believe this is now maintained by @kikomiss and @xinyi-joffre (please confirm)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guenp Thank you for tagging us here

The current maintainers of azure-quantum Python SDK are @ScottCarda-MS and @billti

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the status/stale This has been closed due to inactivity for an extended period of time. label Oct 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size: M 50< lines changed <250

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants