fix(docs): correct typos found during code review

[marcelpetrick]

Non-functional changes only:

• Fixed minor spelling mistakes in comments
• Corrected typos in user-facing strings
• No variables, logic, or functional code was modified.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Petrick mail@marcelpetrick.it

[lurch]

The files in the dependencies directory come from 3rd-party projects, so it probably doesn't make sense to fix typos in those?
(Of course if you're feeling super-keen you're welcome to try and get those typos fixed in their upstream projects)

[marcelpetrick]

The files in the dependencies directory come from 3rd-party projects, so it probably doesn't make sense to fix typos in those? (Of course if you're feeling super-keen you're welcome to try and get those typos fixed in their upstream projects)

Thank you for pointing this out. You are right and I have reverted those two changes.
Changing code of dependencies just leads to confusion next time they are updated.

[tdewey-rpi]

While I appreciate the review - changing previous changelog entries is not something I generally countenance: it feels a little too much like trying to revise history, even if the history you're revising is careless typos.

[marcelpetrick]

@tdewey-rpi I have reverted those changes for compliance.

(Personally, I have the view that the "current state" should be correct. Even if this means altering the past.)

[lurch]

The os-list-schema.html file is autogenerated, so you should also fix https://github.com/raspberrypi/rpi-imager/blob/main/doc/json-schema/os-list-schema.json#L398 otherwise your correction will be lost the next time we regenerate os-list-schema.html 😉