Skip to content

Conversation

@JiangJiaWei1103
Copy link
Contributor

@JiangJiaWei1103 JiangJiaWei1103 commented Dec 7, 2025

Why are these changes needed?

The version of the KubeRay operator is out of date. We upgrade the version from v1.4.2 to v1.5.1 to reflect the latest release.

Related issue number

N/A

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Signed-off-by: JiangJiaWei1103 <waynechuang97@gmail.com>
@JiangJiaWei1103
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @Future-Outlier PTAL, thanks!

Copy link
Member

@Future-Outlier Future-Outlier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1.4.0 should be 1.4.2

Signed-off-by: JiangJiaWei1103 <waynechuang97@gmail.com>
@JiangJiaWei1103 JiangJiaWei1103 changed the title [CI] Upgrade operator version from v1.4.0 to v1.5.1 [CI] Upgrade operator version from v1.4.2 to v1.5.1 Dec 7, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@win5923 win5923 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can test the upgrade from v1.3.2 to v1.5.1, since the larger version gap is more likely to reveal compatibility issues. WDYT?

@rueian
Copy link
Collaborator

rueian commented Dec 8, 2025

Maybe we can test the upgrade from v1.3.2 to v1.5.1, since the larger version gap is more likely to reveal compatibility issues. WDYT?

Sounds good.

Signed-off-by: Rueian <rueiancsie@gmail.com>
@rueian rueian merged commit efd042a into ray-project:master Dec 9, 2025
27 checks passed
@JiangJiaWei1103
Copy link
Contributor Author

JiangJiaWei1103 commented Dec 9, 2025

Thanks @win5923 for your suggestion and @rueian for fixing!

Quick question: should we maintain this e2e to test compatibility across a 2-version gap in the future?

@JiangJiaWei1103 JiangJiaWei1103 deleted the upgrade-operator-helm branch December 9, 2025 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants