Skip to content

Conversation

@neelgala
Copy link
Contributor

This change will fix the issues pointed out in #159 and #158.
The test no longer assumes the reset "type" of mcontrol to be 2 and thus explicitly defines it while updating tdata1.

Also tdata1 is read-back to see if the particular mcontrol fields are valid for the implementation else skip the test-part.

@aswaterman
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, merged (but with the commented-out code deleted)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants