Skip to content

Conversation

@jog1t
Copy link
Contributor

@jog1t jog1t commented Nov 3, 2025

Fixes FRONT-872

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-inspector Error Error Nov 3, 2025 7:17pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud Ignored Ignored Nov 3, 2025 7:17pm
rivet-site Ignored Ignored Preview Nov 3, 2025 7:17pm
rivetkit-serverless Skipped Skipped Nov 3, 2025 7:17pm

Copy link
Contributor Author

jog1t commented Nov 3, 2025

@jog1t jog1t marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2025 19:16
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Nov 3, 2025

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 3, 2025

PR Review: Remove Stickiness of Headers

Summary

This PR removes the sticky top-0 CSS classes from a header div in the "Create New Project" card on the Connect page (line 119). This is a simple UI improvement that removes position stickiness.

Code Quality ✅

  • Clean and focused change: The change is minimal and focused on a single UI improvement
  • Consistent with codebase: Looking at the rest of the file, other similar headers don't use sticky positioning (e.g., line 194, line 318), so this change improves consistency

Potential Issues 🟡

  1. Missing context in PR description: The PR body is empty. It would be helpful to include:

    • Why was the sticky header causing issues? (e.g., overlapping content, scrolling problems, visual glitches)
    • Was there a user report or design decision behind this?
  2. Inconsistency check: While this specific header at line 119 is being updated, I notice the companion card "Connect Existing Project" at line 194 also doesn't have sticky positioning, which suggests this change aligns with the existing pattern. Good consistency!

  3. Visual regression testing: Consider testing:

    • The header behavior when scrolling within the card
    • The layout with different viewport sizes (responsive behavior)
    • Both when hasRunnerNames is false (this view) and true (the main view)

Performance Considerations ✅

  • Positive impact: Removing sticky positioning can actually improve performance slightly, as sticky elements require additional browser calculations during scroll events
  • Minimal change: This is purely a CSS class removal with no runtime performance implications

Security Concerns ✅

  • No security implications for this change

Test Coverage 🟡

  • This is a frontend visual change in a React/TSX file
  • No automated tests appear to be modified or added
  • Recommendation: If you have visual regression testing or E2E tests for this page, verify they still pass. The component rendering should be tested to ensure the layout still looks correct without sticky positioning

Additional Observations

  1. The change affects the "Create New Project" section which is only shown when !hasRunnerNames (line 114-312)
  2. The header still maintains its positioning with mt-2 flex justify-between items-center px-6 py-4, just without sticky behavior
  3. This brings it in line with the other card headers in the same view

Recommendation

Approved with suggestions

The change itself is good and improves consistency. However, please consider:

  1. Adding a brief description in the PR body explaining why sticky positioning was problematic
  2. Verifying the visual appearance across different screen sizes
  3. If you have E2E or visual regression tests, ensure they pass

This review was generated by Claude Code

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Test" took an action on this PR • (11/03/25)

1 assignee was added to this PR based on Kacper Wojciechowski's automation.

Base automatically changed from 10-31-docs_use_correct_port_in_examples to graphite-base/3306 November 6, 2025 17:52
@jog1t jog1t merged commit 6123ddc into graphite-base/3306 Nov 6, 2025
7 of 11 checks passed
@jog1t jog1t deleted the 11-03-fix_fe_remove_stickiness_of_headers branch November 6, 2025 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants