This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 12, 2025. It is now read-only.
SortBy Implementation #273
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Added constants for OrderType. - Added documentations. - Added unit tests covering all the behaviors.
|
any news about this ? @rtfeldman |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on the issue #182 i have created a
sortByfunction based on the current behavior of Lodash and Ramda.Please feel free to reply with feedback and i will be pending of it in order to make the changes that you think that have to be made.
Documentation and unit tests cover the case uses.
Note: I am also planning to add a
sortWithwhich will accept the sorter and reimplementsortByusingsortWith.