-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Add suppression if nowarn differs #23652
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Not sure why |
tgodzik
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
tgodzik
pushed a commit
to scala/scala3-lts
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2025
Fixes scala#23651 The [previous fix](scala#22383) for the same `@nowarn` attached to multiple elements should have compared the `annotPos` to identify duplicates (instead of the target range). This commit defers detecting "bad" or duplicate suppressions (which originate with the same annotation) to report time, after the suppression is "unused"; there are few nowarns per file and fewer that are unused. While checking for a suppression, mark matching unused suppressions as "superseded", so that if they remain unused, the warning can add an "audit" that the nowarn matched a diagnostic (but was superseded by some other nowarn). ~This commit goes further and checks for duplicates (including whether the filters look the same).~ ~If it finds a duplicate where the `annotPos` differs, warn about the user-written annotation.~ ~Filters match each other if they are the same type and, if they have a pattern, the string representations of the patterns are equal.~
tgodzik
added a commit
to scala/scala3-lts
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2025
Fixes scala#23651 The [previous fix](scala#22383) for the same `@nowarn` attached to multiple elements should have compared the `annotPos` to identify duplicates (instead of the target range). This commit defers detecting "bad" or duplicate suppressions (which originate with the same annotation) to report time, after the suppression is "unused"; there are few nowarns per file and fewer that are unused. While checking for a suppression, mark matching unused suppressions as "superseded", so that if they remain unused, the warning can add an "audit" that the nowarn matched a diagnostic (but was superseded by some other nowarn). ~This commit goes further and checks for duplicates (including whether the filters look the same).~ ~If it finds a duplicate where the `annotPos` differs, warn about the user-written annotation.~ ~Filters match each other if they are the same type and, if they have a pattern, the string representations of the patterns are equal.~ [Cherry-picked 40843f7][modified]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:nominated
If we agree to backport this PR, replace this tag with "backport:accepted", otherwise delete it.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #23651
The previous fix for the same
@nowarn
attached to multiple elements should have compared theannotPos
to identify duplicates (instead of the target range).This commit defers detecting "bad" or duplicate suppressions (which originate with the same annotation) to report time, after the suppression is "unused"; there are few nowarns per file and fewer that are unused.
While checking for a suppression, mark matching unused suppressions as "superseded", so that if they remain unused, the warning can add an "audit" that the nowarn matched a diagnostic (but was superseded by some other nowarn).
This commit goes further and checks for duplicates (including whether the filters look the same).If it finds a duplicate where theannotPos
differs, warn about the user-written annotation.Filters match each other if they are the same type and, if they have a pattern, the string representations of the patterns are equal.