Skip to content

Conversation

williamlardier
Copy link
Contributor

For Veeam reoutes, this will set 0 as the metric. The value is correct: if scuba returns a 404 error, it means there is no metric for the resource.

Issue: CLDSRV-758

For Veeam reoutes, this will set 0 as the metric. The value is
correct: if scuba returns a 404 error, it means there is no
metric for the resource.

Issue: CLDSRV-758
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 13, 2025

Hello williamlardier,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 13, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-758 contains:

  • 9.0.31

  • 9.1.5

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.1.5

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-758, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.00%. Comparing base (a8d5672) to head (9c665d1).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/routes/veeam/get.js 97.29% <100.00%> (+9.79%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.1    #5968      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            83.72%   84.00%   +0.27%     
===================================================
  Files                  191      191              
  Lines                12233    12238       +5     
===================================================
+ Hits                 10242    10280      +38     
+ Misses                1991     1958      -33     
Flag Coverage Δ
ceph-backend-test 64.58% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
file-ft-tests 66.90% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
kmip-ft-tests 27.18% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
mongo-v0-ft-tests 68.21% <0.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 68.22% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
multiple-backend 34.23% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
sur-tests 34.77% <0.00%> (-0.87%) ⬇️
sur-tests-inflights 36.70% <0.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
unit 69.32% <100.00%> (+0.99%) ⬆️
utapi-v2-tests 33.56% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@williamlardier williamlardier marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2025 08:15
it('GET capacity.xml should return 200 when scubaclient returns 404 (post-install scenario)', done => {
// This test simulates the post-install scenario where scubaclient returns 404
// because no metrics are available yet. By not calling scuba.incrementBytesForBucket,
// the mock scuba server will return 404 for this bucket.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we do something to make sure it's the case ? My point is that if someone change the mock server, this test will continue to pass 🤷

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Already tracked by this ticket: https://scality.atlassian.net/browse/CLDSRV-528
A bit too early to add scuba yet, we need to drop count items first

Comment on lines +215 to +216
// This test reproduces the post-install scenario where scubaclient returns 404
// because no metrics are available yet
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure it's very pertinent to put it here. You describe this case already in the lib. If we want to know why we have this case, we can check the code already.


getVeeamFile(request, response, bucketMd, log);

// Give async callback time to execute
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you use this logic in each test, we can create a function const giveAsyncCallbackTimeToExecute = setImmediate and the in the test

giveAsyncCallbackTimeToExecute(() => {
  ...
});

Like that your logic will be clean in each tests

getVeeamFile(request, response, bucketMd, log);

setImmediate(() => {
// For 500 errors, we should return error to client
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// For 500 errors, we should return error to client

You already mention that in the it

getVeeamFile(request, response, bucketMd, log);

setImmediate(() => {
// For connection errors, we should return error to client
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same

getVeeamFile(request, response, bucketMd, log);

setImmediate(() => {
// Metadata errors are returned via responseXMLBody
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Metadata errors are returned via responseXMLBody

listVeeamFiles(request, response, null, log);

setImmediate(() => {
// Should return NoSuchBucket error
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not asserted?

});
});

it('GET system.xml should return 200 even when scubaclient is down', done => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this new test is not directly related to the issue, right ?
It's just testing the logic in veeam/get.js that is not using scuba because of the !isSystemXML(request) right ?

Copy link
Contributor

@SylvainSenechal SylvainSenechal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing much to add from Edouard's review, I still very much prefer functional tests over mocks, and I find mocks hard to read, but it's better than nothing

Nits : some variables could be replaced by constants in veeam-route.js : 'test-bucket', 'getBucket'.
I also prefer to not use default parameter for the object key in createRequest, but not very important

Co-authored-by: Edouard COMTET <edouard.comtet@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants