-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
Small micro optimisations in w3lib.http #246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
17da20e
Small micro optimisations
abebus c0d3047
Merge branch 'scrapy:master' into microopts
abebus d737f5a
`headers_raw_to_dict` actually regressed, fix
abebus 0db3f3f
fix typing
abebus 789e5de
even faster and cleaner `headers_raw_to_dict`
abebus 7b163a7
add tests for new early exit cases, restore coverage, surpisingly re…
abebus a5d30c0
stick with `bytearray`, see #247
abebus File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Surprisingly, concatenating plain bytes is noticeably faster than using bytearray. I believe this is thanks to Python’s "new" adaptive interpreter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, it's only faster with relatively small headers — see #247. I had incorrectly assumed that
bytes
would be faster due to adaptive interpreter optimizations. But now I believe the real reason is that strings and bytes don’t always recreate themselves on each concatenation, as explained here