Skip to content

Conversation

@luuhq
Copy link

@luuhq luuhq commented Feb 9, 2013

No description provided.

@travis
Copy link
Owner

travis commented Mar 28, 2013

looks like a good idea, but the patch I just merged conflicts - please update if you'd like to get this in

@luuhq
Copy link
Author

luuhq commented Mar 29, 2013

I have merged the changes. Please review and pull.
Thanks!

@travis
Copy link
Owner

travis commented Mar 29, 2013

don't we still want to stick with crypto:rand_uniform per @shoehn's changes here: #4 ?

Since crypto:rand_uniform returns N, with Lo <= N < Hi, we don't need -1 here.
@luuhq
Copy link
Author

luuhq commented Mar 29, 2013

Sorry about that. I included those changes and removed the -1's.

@travis
Copy link
Owner

travis commented Mar 29, 2013

ok great. @robertoaloi @shoehn would you mind taking a look too? I'm far enough out from all of this that I'm not 100% sure this is right. if you don't get to it I'll test it sometime soon and get it merged. thanks for the patch @sluu99 !

@travis
Copy link
Owner

travis commented Apr 14, 2013

shoot, haven't gotten to this yet and it looks like it's become unmergable in the mean time - could you update this PR to make it mergable? thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants