Add greater-than and less-than variants #128
Merged
+12
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MDLC01
added
the
waiting on reviews
Collaborator
Author
|
I also noticed that |
mkorje
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2025
Collaborator
Makes sense to me. Maybe open a new PR? |
knuesel
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2025
MDLC01
removed
the
waiting on reviews
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds two "families" of variants of greater-than and less-than symbols: the missing double-nested variant (we already have
{gt,lt}.doubleand{gt,lt}.triple.{nested,}), and the closed by curve variant, similar to the.trivariants.The equal line on
{gt,lt}.arc.eqis meant to be slanted, but there is no non-slanted version so the current name is likely fine regardless of how the whole slanted equal mess resolves.