Skip to content

Conversation

@schlosna
Copy link
Contributor

When a websocket message is fully contained in a single ByteBuffer we can avoid allocating a new ByteBuffer and copying the contents.

@baranowb
Copy link
Contributor

Does this PR have a tracking ticket?

@baranowb baranowb added bug fix Contains bug fix(es) under verification Currently being verified (running tests, reviewing) before posting a review to contributor waiting CI check Ready to be merged but waiting for CI check waiting peer review PRs that edit core classes might require an extra review labels Sep 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug fix Contains bug fix(es) under verification Currently being verified (running tests, reviewing) before posting a review to contributor waiting CI check Ready to be merged but waiting for CI check waiting peer review PRs that edit core classes might require an extra review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants