chore: fix titles #599
chore: fix titles #599
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe sidebar configuration in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @tac0turtle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the readability and consistency of the documentation site's sidebar navigation. By adjusting the capitalization and wording of technical specification titles, it aims to enhance the overall user experience when browsing the documentation.
Highlights
- Documentation Navigation Clarity: I've updated the sidebar navigation links for the 'Technical Specifications' section in
.vitepress/config.tsto use proper capitalization and more descriptive names. For example, 'overview' is now 'Overview', 'block-manager' is 'Block Manager', and 'da' is expanded to 'Data Availability'. - Consistency Improvement: This change standardizes the presentation of titles within the documentation sidebar, making it more consistent and user-friendly for readers navigating the technical specifications.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to improve the readability of sidebar titles for the technical specifications. The changes are a good step forward. I've pointed out two instances where the new titles are inconsistent with the corresponding document titles and suggested corrections to improve clarity and consistency across the documentation.
| { text: "store", link: "/learn/specs/store" }, | ||
| { text: "Overview", link: "/learn/specs/overview" }, | ||
| { text: "Block Manager", link: "/learn/specs/block-manager" }, | ||
| { text: "Block Validity", link: "/learn/specs/block-validity" }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new title "Block Validity" is less precise than the title of the document it links to. The file learn/specs/block-validity.md is titled "# Block and Header Validity" and covers both topics. To maintain consistency and avoid confusion, it's best to use the full title from the document.
| { text: "Block Validity", link: "/learn/specs/block-validity" }, | |
| { text: "Block and Header Validity", link: "/learn/specs/block-validity" }, |
| { text: "Block Validity", link: "/learn/specs/block-validity" }, | ||
| { text: "Data Availability", link: "/learn/specs/da" }, | ||
| { text: "Full Node", link: "/learn/specs/full_node" }, | ||
| { text: "Header Sync", link: "/learn/specs/header-sync" }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The title "Header Sync" doesn't fully represent the content of the linked document. The file learn/specs/header-sync.md is titled "# Header and Data Sync" and discusses both. For better accuracy and consistency, I recommend using the document's full title in the sidebar.
| { text: "Header Sync", link: "/learn/specs/header-sync" }, | |
| { text: "Header and Data Sync", link: "/learn/specs/header-sync" }, |
Overview
Summary by CodeRabbit