Skip to content

Conversation

Dunqing
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing commented Sep 24, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Sep 24, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 24, 2025

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #14084 will not alter performance

Comparing 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node (cb29117) with main (90fd46f)

Summary

✅ 33 untouched
⏩ 4 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_normalize_key_of_tspropertysignature branch from 726e28f to 47e0819 Compare September 25, 2025 01:10
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node branch from 061d1ff to 4e5d480 Compare September 25, 2025 01:10
@Dunqing Dunqing marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2025 11:57
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node branch from 4e5d480 to 763ef82 Compare September 26, 2025 16:42
@Dunqing Dunqing force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_normalize_key_of_tspropertysignature branch from 47e0819 to 453f528 Compare September 26, 2025 16:42
@graphite-app graphite-app bot added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 29, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot changed the base branch from 09-24-feat_formatter_normalize_key_of_tspropertysignature to graphite-base/14084 September 29, 2025 12:52
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node branch from 763ef82 to ce44f65 Compare September 29, 2025 12:59
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the graphite-base/14084 branch from 453f528 to 90fd46f Compare September 29, 2025 12:59
@graphite-app graphite-app bot changed the base branch from graphite-base/14084 to main September 29, 2025 13:00
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node branch from ce44f65 to c75e179 Compare September 29, 2025 13:00
@leaysgur leaysgur added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 29, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node branch from c75e179 to cb29117 Compare September 29, 2025 13:17
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit cb29117 into main Sep 29, 2025
26 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 09-24-feat_formatter_correct_printing_parameters_with_return_type_for_function-like_node branch September 29, 2025 13:23
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Sep 29, 2025
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-ast-tools Area - AST tools A-formatter Area - Formatter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants