Skip to content

Conversation

@reddevilmidzy
Copy link
Member

@reddevilmidzy reddevilmidzy commented Jan 2, 2026

tracking issue #144404

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 2, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 2, 2026

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Comment on lines 243 to 255
(internal, pattern_types, "1.79.0", Some(123646)),
/// Allows using `#[prelude_import]` on glob `use` items.
(internal, prelude_import, "1.2.0", None),
/// Used to identify crates that contain the profiler runtime.
(internal, profiler_runtime, "1.18.0", None),
/// Allows using `rustc_*` attributes (RFC 572).
(internal, rustc_attrs, "1.0.0", None),
/// Introduces a hierarchy of `Sized` traits (RFC 3729).
(unstable, sized_hierarchy, "1.89.0", None),
/// Allows using the `#[stable]` and `#[unstable]` attributes.
(internal, staged_api, "1.0.0", None),
/// Added for testing unstable lints; perma-unstable.
(internal, test_unstable_lint, "1.60.0", None),
/// Helps with formatting for `group_imports = "StdExternalCrate"`.
(unstable, unqualified_local_imports, "1.83.0", Some(138299)),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although not related to this PR, pattern_types and unqualified_local_imports are included in the no-tracking-issues group despite being tracking issues. I'm trying to move them to the group below. Should I separate them from this PR? Or is it better to just make a separate commit?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doing it in this PR seems fine

@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

BoxyUwU commented Jan 2, 2026

r? BoxyUwU

@rustbot rustbot assigned BoxyUwU and unassigned fee1-dead Jan 2, 2026
@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

BoxyUwU commented Jan 3, 2026

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 3, 2026

📌 Commit 3fc3226 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 3, 2026
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2026
Rollup of 2 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #150596 (Add tracking issue for sized_hierarchy)
 - #150651 (Fix typo in pattern usefulness documentation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 24ba7d8 into rust-lang:main Jan 4, 2026
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Jan 4, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2026
Rollup merge of #150596 - reddevilmidzy:add-tracking, r=BoxyUwU

Add tracking issue for sized_hierarchy

tracking issue #144404
@reddevilmidzy reddevilmidzy deleted the add-tracking branch January 4, 2026 06:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants