-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Add a vocabulary registry (II) #53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
domel
wants to merge
5
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
vocab_reg
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gkellogg
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2025
spec/index.html
Outdated
Comment on lines
1515
to
1517
<tr><td><code>rdf:CompoundLiteral</code></td><td>[[JSON-LD11]]</td><td>Consideration should be given to the use of <code>rdf:dirLangString</code></td></tr> | ||
<tr><td><code>rdf:direction</code></td><td>[[JSON-LD11]]</td><td>Consideration should be given to the use of <code>rdf:dirLangString</code></td></tr> | ||
<tr><td><code>rdf:language</code></td><td>[[JSON-LD11]]</td><td>Consideration should be given to the use of <code>rdf:dirLangString</code></td></tr> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These three might be considered archaic, if not deprecated, but need to remain as long as JSON-LD uses them.
TallTed
suggested changes
Aug 13, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tiny editorial
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
TallTed
reviewed
Aug 15, 2025
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses the discussion in #36 on helping readers of the specification answer the question "What are all the terms defined in the
rdf:
andrdfs:
namespaces?", as reader currently has to check multiple specifications to obtain an exhaustive list.The proposal in this PR is to define a registry section for the
rdf:
andrdfs:
vocabulary in accordance with § 6.5 The Registry Track of the W3C Process.This is a version after reorganization based on #51
/CC @ektrah
Preview | Diff