Skip to content

Conversation

samcunliffe
Copy link
Member

Following discussion, this would be a compromise resolution to #350.

As this could be controversial, I will add two reviewers. (cc @dstansby but I don't want to disturb your holiday)

@samcunliffe samcunliffe requested review from a team and matt-graham October 22, 2024 13:11
@samcunliffe samcunliffe linked an issue Oct 22, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@paddyroddy paddyroddy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🫐

@paddyroddy paddyroddy added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-2-reviewers Could be considered "controversial" so worth a second pair of eyes labels Oct 22, 2024
@samcunliffe samcunliffe requested a review from dstansby November 4, 2024 13:07
@samcunliffe samcunliffe changed the title Two reviewers for "controversial" changes. Two reviewers for "opinionated" changes. Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@matt-graham matt-graham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems all reasonable to me - have made a small suggestion to change one occurence of opinion changes to opinionated changes

@samcunliffe samcunliffe dismissed dstansby’s stale review November 6, 2024 20:37

Replaced "controversial" with "opinonated"

@samcunliffe samcunliffe enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2024 20:37
@samcunliffe samcunliffe merged commit 642e42b into main Nov 6, 2024
13 checks passed
@samcunliffe samcunliffe deleted the 350-move-to-having-two-reviewers-for-pull-requests branch November 6, 2024 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation needs-2-reviewers Could be considered "controversial" so worth a second pair of eyes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move to having two reviewers for pull requests?

4 participants