-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
chore(rivetkit): pass request id from driver to conn so we can correlate underlying requests with connections #3318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
Pull Request Review: Pass Request ID from Driver to ConnectionSummaryThis PR implements request ID tracking throughout the connection lifecycle, enabling correlation between underlying requests and connections for improved observability and debugging. The changes span TypeScript SDK code, RivetKit packages, and Grafana dashboard configurations. Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Strengths
🔍 Areas for Improvement
Potential Bugs
|
2b9939b to
f50eb7f
Compare
fe12a10 to
6282237
Compare
PR Review: Pass request ID from driver to connSummaryThis PR implements request ID tracking from the driver level down to connections, enabling better correlation between underlying requests and connections. The changes are well-structured and improve observability. Positive Observations1. Consistent Naming Convention ✅The refactoring from
2. Clean API Changes ✅The changes to fetch: (runner: Runner, actorId: string, requestId: protocol.RequestId, request: Request)
websocket: (runner: Runner, actorId: string, ws: any, requestId: protocol.RequestId, request: Request)3. Improved Observability ✅Adding requestId: conn.__socket?.requestId,
driver: conn.__driverState
? getConnDriverKindFromState(conn.__driverState)
: undefined,4. Consistent ID Generation ✅Using 5. Proper Propagation ✅The
Issues & Concerns1.
|
6282237 to
d22a4df
Compare
Code ReviewThis PR refactors the connection tracking system to use requestId instead of socketId throughout the codebase. This improves observability by allowing correlation between driver-level requests and connection-level operations. Strengths
Code QualityGood patterns:
Minor issues:
Potential Issues
Performance
Questions
RecommendationsLGTM with minor suggestions. Before merging:
The core logic is sound and maintains all existing functionality while improving traceability. |
Merge activity
|
…ate underlying requests with connections (#3318)
…ate underlying requests with connections
d22a4df to
82a8b53
Compare
59e900d to
4fddf6b
Compare
PR Review: Pass Request ID from Driver to ConnOverviewThis PR successfully implements request ID propagation from the driver layer through to connections, enabling correlation between underlying requests and connections for improved observability. Positive Aspects
Code Quality ObservationsGood Practices
Minor Issues
Potential Concerns
Security ConsiderationsNo security issues identified. The request ID is a UUID used for correlation only, not authentication/authorization. Performance ConsiderationsNo performance concerns. The changes add minimal overhead (UUID generation and passing an additional parameter). Test CoverageRecommendation: Add tests to verify:
Example test case: test("should ignore stale disconnect events with mismatched request IDs", async () => {
// Create connection with requestId1
// Reconnect same connection with requestId2
// Trigger disconnect with requestId1
// Assert connection still active
});Recommendations
ConclusionThis is a solid observability improvement. The code quality is good with clear intent and proper error handling. The main recommendations are minor cleanup items and test coverage additions. Approval Status: ✅ Approved with minor suggestions Generated by Claude Code |
Code Review - PR #3318SummaryThis PR adds request ID tracking through the connection stack, allowing correlation between driver-level requests and connections. The changes propagate the request ID from the runner tunnel layer through to connection objects. Positive Observations✅ Good architectural improvement: Passing request IDs through the stack enables better observability and debugging by correlating requests with connections. ✅ Consistent naming: The rename from ✅ Proper propagation: The request ID flows cleanly through:
✅ Non-breaking for generated files: Grafana dashboard changes are just formatting (multi-line arrays to single-line), which is acceptable for generated configs. Issues & Concerns1. Potential Breaking Change
|
…ate underlying requests with connections (#3318)

No description provided.