Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-serverless Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 4, 2025 7:00pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud Ignored Ignored Nov 4, 2025 7:00pm
rivet-inspector Ignored Ignored Preview Nov 4, 2025 7:00pm
rivet-site Ignored Ignored Preview Nov 4, 2025 7:00pm

Copy link
Member Author

NathanFlurry commented Nov 3, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 3, 2025

PR Review: Add RivetKit Driver Test Writer Agent

Summary

This PR adds a specialized Claude agent for writing, modifying, and debugging RivetKit driver tests. Overall, this is a well-structured agent definition that demonstrates good understanding of the testing framework and provides clear guidance. Below are my findings organized by category.

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

Strengths:

  • Clear, well-defined scope and responsibilities
  • Comprehensive examples showing when to use the agent
  • Good use of YAML frontmatter for agent metadata (name, description, model, color)
  • Structured with logical sections: responsibilities, operational rules, decision-making, quality assurance
  • Emphasizes best practices like isolated tests, deterministic behavior, and proper cleanup

Suggestions:

  1. Test command format needs correction: The agent specifies running tests with pnpm test driver-{driver} -t '{test filter}', but based on package.json:158, the test command is simply vitest run. The actual test files are tests/driver-engine.test.ts, tests/driver-file-system.test.ts, and tests/driver-memory.test.ts. The command should be:

    cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test tests/driver-memory.test.ts -t 'test filter'

    Or more accurately using vitest directly:

    cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm vitest run tests/driver-engine.test.ts -t 'test name'
  2. Driver naming inconsistency: The agent mentions drivers as driver-engine, driver-file-system, driver-memory, but the actual test files use tests/driver-*.test.ts pattern. This should be clarified.

Potential Issues 🔍

  1. Incorrect path assumptions: The agent states tests are in src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts and fixtures in fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts. While the test utilities ARE in src/driver-test-suite/tests/, the actual driver test files that import and run them are in the tests/ directory at the package root. This is a critical distinction that could confuse the agent.

  2. Test execution pattern mismatch: The agent suggests filtering tests with -t '{test filter}', but looking at tests/driver-memory.test.ts:5, the tests are actually run via runDriverTests() which imports test suites from src/driver-test-suite/tests/. Users would filter by test suite names (like "Actor State Tests" or "State Persistence") not arbitrary filters.

  3. Missing context about test architecture: The agent doesn't explain that:

    • tests/driver-*.test.ts are the entry points that configure and run the test suite
    • src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts contain reusable test functions that are driver-agnostic
    • fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts contain actor fixtures used across all tests
    • Each driver test file calls runDriverTests() with driver-specific configuration

Performance Considerations ⚡

  • Good: The agent correctly emphasizes NEVER running the entire test suite and always using specific filters
  • Good: Recommendation to pipe output to /tmp/ files aligns with CLAUDE.md testing guidelines
  • Suggestion: Could mention the useRealTimers configuration option seen in driver-memory.test.ts:7 for debugging timing-related issues

Security Concerns 🔒

No security issues identified. This is an internal development tool.

Test Coverage 📊

The agent itself provides good coverage of testing scenarios in its examples:

  • Caching behavior testing
  • Debugging failing tests
  • Creating fixture actors
  • Adding test coverage for new features

However, it should clarify that most test writing will be in src/driver-test-suite/tests/ to create driver-agnostic test suites, not in the individual tests/driver-*.test.ts files.

Alignment with CLAUDE.md 📋

Good alignment:

  • ✅ References pnpm (per dependency management guidelines)
  • ✅ Emphasizes piping test output to files and grepping separately
  • ✅ Uses TypeScript best practices

Could improve:

  • The agent should reference the testing guidelines from CLAUDE.md more explicitly
  • Should mention checking for workspace dependencies when fixtures need new packages

Specific Recommendations

Critical Fixes Needed:

  1. Clarify the test architecture in the agent prompt:
## RivetKit Test Architecture

- **Driver Test Files** (`tests/driver-*.test.ts`): Entry points that configure and run tests for specific drivers (engine, file-system, memory)
- **Test Suites** (`src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts`): Reusable, driver-agnostic test functions exported via `runActorStateTests()`, `runActorConnTests()`, etc.
- **Fixtures** (`fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts`): Actor implementations used as test subjects
  1. Update the test execution command section:
### Test Execution
- Run specific driver tests: `cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test tests/driver-{driver}.test.ts -t '{test filter}'`
- Available driver test files: `driver-engine.test.ts`, `driver-file-system.test.ts`, `driver-memory.test.ts`
- Filter by test suite name (e.g., "Actor State Tests", "State Persistence")
  1. Add guidance on WHERE to write tests:
    • New test suites go in src/driver-test-suite/tests/ and are imported by driver test files
    • New fixtures go in fixtures/driver-test-suite/
    • Modifications to driver-specific configuration go in tests/driver-*.test.ts

Minor Enhancements:

  1. Add a note about the skip configuration option (seen in driver-memory.test.ts:8-11)
  2. Mention that some features may not be available on all drivers (e.g., sleep on memory driver)
  3. Reference the createTestRuntime() helper and DriverTestConfig type

Conclusion

This is a solid foundation for a specialized testing agent. The main issues are around accurate representation of the test file structure and command execution patterns. Once the path clarifications and command corrections are made, this will be a very useful agent for RivetKit development.

Recommendation: Request changes to fix the critical path and command issues before merging.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 4, 2025

PR Review: RivetKit Driver Test Writer Agent

I've reviewed this PR which adds a new Claude Code agent specifically for writing and debugging RivetKit driver tests. Overall, this is a well-structured agent definition that will be valuable for the team. Here's my detailed feedback:

✅ Strengths

  1. Clear Purpose & Scope: The agent has a well-defined purpose with specific, actionable examples in the description field. The examples effectively demonstrate when this agent should be invoked.

  2. Accurate File Paths: I verified that all referenced paths exist:

    • rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts
    • rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts
  3. Comprehensive Guidance: The agent prompt includes thorough instructions covering:

    • Test execution patterns (with correct command format)
    • Code style guidelines aligned with Vitest best practices
    • Quality assurance checklist
    • Decision-making framework
  4. Safety Controls: Good inclusion of the "NEVER run the entire test suite" rule and mandatory test filtering - this prevents expensive full test runs.

🔍 Issues & Recommendations

Critical Issues

  1. Incorrect Test Command Format (line 29, 32)

    The agent specifies:

    pnpm test driver-{driver} -t '{test filter}'

    However, based on the actual codebase structure:

    • Test files are named driver-engine.test.ts, driver-memory.test.ts, driver-file-system.test.ts
    • The package.json shows: "test": "vitest run"
    • The correct command should be:
    cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test tests/driver-engine.test.ts -t '{test filter}'

    Recommendation: Update the command format to match actual Vitest usage patterns. The current format may not work as expected.

  2. Inconsistent Terminology (line 36)

    Uses it in the guidance, but the actual test files use test:

    • Agent says: "Use Vitest's describe, it, expect..."
    • Codebase uses: test("actor sleep persists state", async (c) => { ... })

    Recommendation: Change it to test to match the codebase convention.

Minor Issues

  1. Missing Test Pattern Context (line 34-39)

    The agent doesn't mention the actual pattern used in the codebase where test suites are defined as exported functions that accept a DriverTestConfig:

    export function runActorSleepTests(driverTestConfig: DriverTestConfig) {
      describe.skipIf(driverTestConfig.skip?.sleep)("Actor Sleep Tests", () => {
        test("actor sleep persists state", async (c) => { ... });
      });
    }

    Recommendation: Add guidance about this pattern since it's critical for proper test suite structure.

  2. Logging Pattern Not Mentioned

    The agent doesn't reference the project's CLAUDE.md which specifies structured logging patterns:

    • Use c.log.info({msg: "...", ...fields}) for structured logging
    • Log messages should be lowercase

    This is particularly important since the fixture actors use logging extensively.

    Recommendation: Add a section about logging patterns or reference CLAUDE.md for consistency.

  3. pnpm Workspace Context Missing

    The command examples don't mention that this is a pnpm workspace (noted in CLAUDE.md). While the commands are correct, adding context about the workspace structure would help the agent understand the project layout.

  4. Typo in Line 32

    The example command has a typo: error\|fail should probably be 'error\|fail' (wrapped in quotes for grep).

📝 Suggested Improvements

  1. Add a "Common Patterns" Section:

    ### Common Test Patterns in RivetKit
    - Test suites are exported functions: `export function runXTests(driverTestConfig: DriverTestConfig)`
    - Use `describe.skipIf(driverTestConfig.skip?.feature)` for conditional test skipping
    - Tests receive a context parameter `c` from `setupDriverTest()`
    - Use `waitFor(driverTestConfig, ms)` for timing operations (respects fake/real timers)
  2. Reference CLAUDE.md:
    Add a note that the agent should reference the project's CLAUDE.md for general conventions (logging, code style, etc.).

  3. Add Troubleshooting Section:
    Include guidance for common test issues like timing/race conditions, fake timer usage, and cleanup patterns.

🔒 Security Considerations

No security concerns - this is configuration for a development tool agent.

✅ Test Coverage

Not applicable - this is agent configuration, not code that needs tests.

🎯 Performance Considerations

The mandatory use of test filters (line 28) is excellent for performance. The guidance to pipe output to /tmp/ files is also good practice.

📊 Overall Assessment

This is a valuable addition that will help streamline RivetKit test development. The main blocker is the incorrect test command format which needs to be fixed before this agent can work properly. With the recommended corrections, this will be a solid tool for the team.

Recommendation: Request changes for the test command format correction, then approve.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 4, 2025

PR Review: RivetKit Driver Test Writer Agent

I've reviewed this PR which adds a specialized Claude Code agent for RivetKit driver test development. This is a well-crafted agent definition that will be valuable for the team. Here's my detailed analysis:

✅ Strengths

  1. Excellent Structure & Documentation: The agent prompt is comprehensive, well-organized, and includes clear examples showing when to invoke it. The YAML frontmatter is properly formatted with appropriate metadata.

  2. Verified Paths: All referenced directories exist and contain the expected files:

    • rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts (18 test suite files)
    • rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts (18 fixture files)
  3. Strong Best Practices: The agent emphasizes important testing principles like isolation, determinism, proper cleanup, and descriptive test names. The quality assurance checklist is particularly valuable.

  4. Good Safety Controls: The mandate to NEVER run the entire test suite and always use specific filters will prevent expensive, time-consuming test runs.

  5. Aligned with Project Conventions: The agent correctly references pnpm usage and the practice of piping test output to /tmp/ files for analysis, which aligns with CLAUDE.md guidelines.

🔍 Issues Requiring Attention

Critical: Test Command Format

Lines 29-32: The test execution command format needs correction.

Currently states:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-{driver} -t '{test filter}'

However, based on package.json:158 ("test": "vitest run") and the actual test file structure, the correct format should be:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test tests/driver-engine.test.ts -t 'test name pattern'

Available driver test files:

  • tests/driver-engine.test.ts
  • tests/driver-memory.test.ts
  • tests/driver-file-system.test.ts

Minor: Terminology Inconsistency

Line 36: The agent mentions using it for tests, but the codebase consistently uses test:

// Actual pattern from actor-sleep.ts:15
test("actor sleep persists state", async (c) => {
  // ...
});

Recommendation: Change "Use Vitest's describe, it, expect..." to "Use Vitest's describe, test, expect..."

📋 Suggested Enhancements

  1. Clarify Test Architecture: The agent should explain the three-layer structure I observed:

    • Entry points: tests/driver-*.test.ts files that configure and invoke runDriverTests()
    • Test suites: src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts with exported functions like runActorSleepTests(driverTestConfig)
    • Fixtures: fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts with reusable actor implementations
  2. Add Common Patterns Section: Include the key pattern used throughout the test suite:

    export function runFeatureTests(driverTestConfig: DriverTestConfig) {
      describe.skipIf(driverTestConfig.skip?.feature)("Feature Tests", () => {
        test("specific behavior", async (c) => {
          const { client } = await setupDriverTest(c, driverTestConfig);
          // test implementation
        });
      });
    }
  3. Reference Logging Patterns: Since fixtures use logging extensively, mention the structured logging patterns from CLAUDE.md (lowercase messages, structured fields using ? prefix for debug formatting).

  4. Note Skip Configuration: Mention the skip configuration options (line 10-14 of driver-engine.test.ts) that control which test suites run for each driver.

🎯 Minor Corrections

  • Line 32: The grep pattern should be properly quoted: grep -i 'error\|fail' or grep -iE 'error|fail'
  • Line 10: Small typo in a comment within the agent text: "imeplment" → "implement" (though this appears to be in a referenced file comment, not the agent itself)

🔒 Security & Performance

  • Security: No concerns - this is internal development tooling
  • Performance: Excellent guidance on using filters and limiting test scope

📊 Overall Assessment

This is a valuable addition that will significantly help with RivetKit test development. The agent prompt is thorough and well-thought-out. The main issue is the test command format which needs correction before this agent can function properly.

Recommendation: Approve with the understanding that the test command format should be corrected. The critical fix is straightforward and the rest of the agent is solid.


Nice work on creating such a comprehensive agent definition! This will be very helpful for maintaining consistent test quality across the RivetKit driver implementations.

@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 11-02-fix_rivetkit_prevent_sleeping_if_there_are_any_action_hono_requests_fixes_inspector_requests_not_resetiting_sleep_timer branch from 5fc0aa1 to 91f44ec Compare November 4, 2025 19:24
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 11-02-chore_add_rivetkit_test_writer_agent branch from b677d17 to 16142c0 Compare November 4, 2025 19:24
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Deployment failed with the following error:

Too many requests - try again in 4 minutes (more than 120, code: "api-deployments-flood-pro").

Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Code Review for RivetKit Driver Test Writer Agent

Overall, this is a well-structured agent definition that will be helpful for maintaining and expanding the RivetKit driver test suite. Here's my detailed feedback:

✅ Strengths

  1. Clear Scope and Purpose: The agent description effectively communicates when to use this agent with concrete examples
  2. Comprehensive Responsibilities: Covers the full testing lifecycle - writing, implementing fixtures, and debugging
  3. Good Safety Guardrails: Critical operational rules prevent running the entire test suite and enforce targeted filtering
  4. Quality Checklist: Provides a useful pre-completion checklist to ensure test quality
  5. Contextual Examples: The usage examples in the description are practical and cover common scenarios

🔍 Issues Found

1. Incorrect Test Command Format (Critical)

Lines 30-31 specify:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-{driver} -t '{test filter}'

However, based on the actual test files at rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/tests/driver-*.test.ts, the correct command should be:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-{driver}.test.ts -t '{test filter}'

The test files are:

  • driver-engine.test.ts
  • driver-file-system.test.ts
  • driver-memory.test.ts

The command format needs .test.ts extension or Vitest may not find the test files correctly.

Example correction:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-engine.test.ts -t 'workflow cancellation'

2. Incomplete Driver List

Line 31 lists available drivers as:

Available drivers: driver-engine, driver-file-system, driver-memory

However, there's also a cloudflare-workers driver with tests at rivetkit-typescript/packages/cloudflare-workers/tests/driver-tests.test.ts. Consider whether this should be mentioned or if it's intentionally excluded due to its different location.

3. Path Ambiguity in Test Execution Example

Line 32 shows:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-engine -t 'workflow cancellation' > /tmp/test-output.log 2>&1

This should also include the .test.ts extension for consistency.

📋 Recommendations

Documentation & Clarity

  1. Add File Discovery Section: Include guidance on how to find existing test files and fixtures to understand patterns before creating new ones
  2. Clarify Test File Naming: Mention that individual test cases are in src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts but are executed through entry files in tests/driver-*.test.ts
  3. Add Import Pattern Examples: Show common imports like from "@/driver-test-suite/mod" and from "vitest"

Best Practices

  1. Emphasize Test Isolation: Add guidance about avoiding shared mutable state between tests
  2. Async/Await Patterns: Mention the importance of proper async/await usage with setupDriverTest helper
  3. Error Message Quality: Encourage descriptive error messages in assertions

Testing Strategy

  1. Coverage Guidance: Add a section about ensuring tests cover all three drivers (engine, file-system, memory) when applicable, noting their different capabilities (e.g., memory driver doesn't support sleep)
  2. Real vs Mock Timers: Explain when to use useRealTimers: true in the DriverTestConfig (currently only briefly mentioned)

🎯 Suggested Additions

Consider adding these sections:

Common Gotchas:

  • Memory driver doesn't support sleep operations (skip: { sleep: true })
  • Some drivers may require real timers instead of Vitest mocked timers
  • Cleanup is critical to prevent test pollution

Test File Organization:

  • Entry point files: tests/driver-*.test.ts (invoke runDriverTests)
  • Test case files: src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts (export test functions)
  • Test fixtures: fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts (export actors)
  • Shared utilities: src/driver-test-suite/utils.ts (helpers like setupDriverTest)

🛡️ Security & Performance

No security concerns identified. The agent appropriately:

  • Restricts test execution to specific filters
  • Redirects output to /tmp/ for analysis
  • Emphasizes isolated, deterministic tests

✍️ Code Style Compliance

The agent properly follows repository conventions:

  • TypeScript usage
  • Vitest testing framework
  • Structured logging patterns
  • Async/await patterns

📊 Conclusion

Verdict: Approve with changes requested for the test command format.

The agent is well-designed and will be valuable for the team. The critical issue is the incorrect command format that needs fixing. Other recommendations would enhance usability but aren't blockers.

Priority fixes:

  1. ✅ Fix test command to include .test.ts extension (lines 30-32)
  2. ⚠️ Consider clarifying the driver list and test file organization

Nice-to-haves:

  • Additional documentation sections mentioned above
  • More examples of common test patterns

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Merge activity

  • Nov 4, 8:09 PM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Nov 4, 8:11 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3349) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Nov 4, 8:41 PM UTC: The Graphite merge queue removed this pull request due to removal of a downstack PR #3342.
  • Nov 4, 8:49 PM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Nov 4, 8:50 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3352) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Nov 4, 8:52 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #3352.

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 11-02-fix_rivetkit_prevent_sleeping_if_there_are_any_action_hono_requests_fixes_inspector_requests_not_resetiting_sleep_timer branch from 91f44ec to 40b7e52 Compare November 4, 2025 20:25
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 11-02-chore_add_rivetkit_test_writer_agent branch from 16142c0 to 22d5ec0 Compare November 4, 2025 20:25
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Deployment failed with the following error:

Too many requests - try again in 5 minutes (more than 120, code: "api-deployments-flood-pro").

Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Code Review: RivetKit Driver Test Writer Agent

Thank you for adding this specialized agent for RivetKit driver test development! This is a well-structured and comprehensive agent configuration. Here's my detailed review:

✅ Strengths

  1. Clear Scope & Purpose: The description provides excellent examples showing when to use this agent, making it easy for users to understand its intended use cases.

  2. Comprehensive Documentation: The agent prompt covers all critical aspects:

    • Core responsibilities
    • Operational rules
    • Quality assurance checklist
    • Decision-making framework
  3. Safety First: The test execution rules correctly emphasize:

    • NEVER running the entire test suite (good for CI/CD performance)
    • Always using specific test filters
    • Proper output handling with piping to /tmp/ files
  4. Best Practices: Encourages studying existing patterns before creating new tests, which maintains consistency.

  5. Structured Approach: The incremental implementation strategy (happy path → edge cases → error conditions) is solid.

🔍 Issues & Suggestions

1. Test Command Format Issue (Minor)

Location: Line 28-29

The documented test command format appears incomplete:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-{driver} -t '{test filter}'

Issue: Based on the package.json analysis:

  • The test script is: "test": "vitest run"
  • This doesn't show how driver-engine, driver-file-system, or driver-memory are used as test filters

Verification Needed:

  • Is this relying on Vitest's file path filtering? (e.g., pnpm test driver-engine would match files containing "driver-engine" in their path?)
  • Should this be: pnpm test -- driver-engine -t 'test filter' with the double dash for vitest args?

Recommendation: Verify this command actually works and update the documentation accordingly. Consider adding a real working example.

2. Missing Fixture Import Patterns (Minor)

Location: Line 62 (Fixture Actor Development section)

The agent provides guidance on implementing fixtures but doesn't show:

  • How fixtures are exported/imported
  • The typical file structure pattern
  • Example of how to register fixtures with the test suite

From my review of conn-state.ts, I see fixtures use:

import { actor } from "rivetkit";
export const connStateActor = actor({ ... });

Recommendation: Add a brief example showing the fixture export pattern.

3. Test Isolation Guidance (Enhancement)

Location: Line 44-47 (Test Structure Best Practices)

While cleanup in afterEach is mentioned, there's no specific guidance on:

  • How to properly tear down RivetKit actors between tests
  • Connection cleanup patterns
  • Driver-specific cleanup considerations

Recommendation: Add a subsection about RivetKit-specific cleanup patterns, especially for distributed resources.

4. Error Handling in Tests (Enhancement)

The guide doesn't mention:

  • How to test error conditions in RivetKit
  • Expected error types and how to assert them
  • Timeout handling for distributed operations

Recommendation: Add guidance on testing failure scenarios and error assertions.

5. Determinism in Distributed Systems (Clarification Needed)

Location: Line 25 ("Resilient to timing issues in distributed systems")

This is mentioned but not elaborated on. Given RivetKit's distributed nature:

  • What retry patterns should be used?
  • How to handle eventual consistency?
  • When to use polling vs. waiting?

Recommendation: Add a section on handling timing and race conditions in distributed tests.

🎯 Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Verify and fix the test command syntax - This is critical for the agent to function correctly
  2. Add a complete working example - Show one full test from start to finish with the exact commands to run it

Medium Priority:

  1. Add fixture import/export pattern examples
  2. Document RivetKit-specific cleanup patterns
  3. Add error handling test patterns

Low Priority:

  1. Expand on distributed system testing strategies
  2. Consider adding troubleshooting tips for common test failures

📋 Code Quality Assessment

  • Documentation Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) - Excellent structure and comprehensiveness
  • Completeness: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) - Missing some RivetKit-specific patterns
  • Accuracy: ⚠️ Needs Verification - Test command format needs validation
  • Maintainability: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) - Well-organized and easy to update

✅ Approval Status

Conditional Approval - Please verify the test command format works correctly. If it does, this is ready to merge. If not, please update line 28-29 with the correct command syntax.

🧪 Suggested Testing

Before merging, please verify:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit
pnpm test driver-engine -t 'persists state'

Should successfully run only the state persistence tests for the engine driver.


Great work on this agent! The structure is solid and it will be very helpful for maintaining test quality across the RivetKit driver implementations. 🚀

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Pull Request Review

This PR adds a specialized Claude agent for writing RivetKit driver tests. Here's my analysis:

✅ Strengths

  1. Well-Documented Purpose: The agent description clearly explains when and how to use it with concrete examples
  2. Accurate Technical Details: After verifying the codebase, the agent instructions correctly reference:
    • Test file locations (rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/src/driver-test-suite/tests/*.ts)
    • Fixture locations (rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit/fixtures/driver-test-suite/*.ts)
    • Available drivers (engine, file-system, memory)
    • Test patterns using Vitest
  3. Comprehensive Guidance: Includes operational rules, code style patterns, testing best practices, and a quality assurance checklist
  4. Practical Examples: The examples demonstrate different use cases effectively

🔍 Issues & Recommendations

1. Test Command Syntax Needs Correction

The agent instructs to run tests with:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-{driver} -t '{test filter}'

However, based on the actual test structure, the correct command should be:

cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test tests/driver-{driver}.test.ts -t '{test filter}'

Files to reference: The driver test files are located at:

  • tests/driver-engine.test.ts
  • tests/driver-file-system.test.ts
  • tests/driver-memory.test.ts

Recommended fix: Update line 29 to use the correct file path pattern.

2. Missing Context About Test Structure

The agent should mention that:

  • Driver tests use runDriverTests() from @/driver-test-suite/mod
  • Tests run across multiple client types, encodings, and transports automatically
  • Individual test functions are in src/driver-test-suite/tests/ and are invoked by the runDriverTests() orchestrator

This helps the agent understand the layered test architecture.

3. Logging Pattern Alignment

The agent should reference the project's logging conventions from CLAUDE.md:

  • Use structured logging with tracing
  • Format: tracing::info\!(?x, "message") not tracing::info\!("message {x}")

While this is Rust-specific, the TypeScript equivalent would be structured logging patterns if applicable.

4. Minor: Example Command Enhancement

Line 32's example command could be improved:

# Current
cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test driver-engine -t 'workflow cancellation' > /tmp/test-output.log 2>&1 && grep -i 'error\|fail' /tmp/test-output.log

# Better (clearer separation of concerns)
cd rivetkit-typescript/packages/rivetkit && pnpm test tests/driver-engine.test.ts -t 'workflow cancellation' > /tmp/test-output.log 2>&1
grep -i 'error\|fail' /tmp/test-output.log

This aligns better with the project's testing guidelines about piping to files and grepping separately.

📋 Suggested Changes

  1. Line 29: Update test command format to match actual file structure
  2. Line 60-65: Add section explaining the test architecture (runDriverTests orchestrator vs individual test functions)
  3. Line 32: Split the compound command into separate steps for clarity

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a valuable addition that will help guide test development for RivetKit. The agent provides comprehensive guidance and follows good documentation practices. With the command syntax corrections, this will be production-ready.

Recommendation: Approve with minor corrections to the test command syntax.


Review generated by Claude Code

graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Nov 4, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 11-02-chore_add_rivetkit_test_writer_agent branch November 4, 2025 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants